Over half of patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are 65 years or older. We examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival among elderly patients in routine clinical practice. We utilized a retrospective cohort analysis of first primary AML patients in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009, >66 years, and continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A and B in the year prior to diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed overall survival by treatment. There were 3327 (40 %) patients who received chemotherapy within 3 months of diagnosis. Treated patients were more likely younger, male, and married, and less likely to have secondary AML and poor performance indicators and comorbidity score compared to untreated patients. In multivariate survival analysis, treated patients exhibited a significant 33 % lower risk of death compared to untreated patients. Significant survival benefits were noted with receipt of intensive and hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapies compared to no therapy. A survival benefit with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was seen in younger Medicare patients. This real-world study showed that about 60 % of elderly AML patients remain untreated following diagnosis. Use of anti-leukemic therapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in this elderly cohort.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00277-015-2351-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In a phase 1 dose escalation study, 13 subjects with hemophilia A received by peripheral intravenous infusion a retroviral vector carrying a B-domain-deleted human factor VIII (hFVIII) gene. Infusions were well tolerated. Tests for replication competent retrovirus have been negative. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses demonstrate the persistence of vector gene sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 3 of 3 subjects tested. Factor VIII was measured in serial samples using both a one-stage clotting assay and a chromogenic assay. While no subject had sustained FVIII increases, 9 subjects had FVIII higher than 1% on at least 2 occasions 5 or more days after infusion of exogenous FVIII, with isolated levels that ranged from 2.3% to 19%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of exogenous FVIII infused into subjects 13 weeks after vector infusion showed an increased half-life (T 1/2 ; P < .02) and area under the curve (AUC, P < .04) compared with prestudy values. Bleeding frequency decreased in 5 subjects compared with historical rates. These results demonstrate that this retroviral vector (hFVIII(V)) is safe and, in some subjects, persists more than a year in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with measurable factor VIII levels and with increased available FVIII activity (increased T 1/2 and AUC) after infusion of exogenous FVIII concentrate.

Approximately 25% of hemophilia A patients infused with factor VIII (fVIII) mount an immune response, which leads to its inactivation. Anti-fVIII autoantibodies are also seen rarely in individuals with normal fVIII. We have previously demonstrated that some anti-A2 and anti-C2 domain antibodies are fVIII inhibitors and that many patients have additional inhibitors with a fVIII light chain (LCh) epitope outside C2. Because the contribution of the different antibodies to the plasma inhibitor titer had been examined in a limited number of patients (14), we report in this study a more extensive analysis of 55 plasmas. The dominant inhibitors in 62% (13 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas were directed only against C2 or A2, but not both, whereas this pattern was found in only 15% (5 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas. In addition, anti-A2 inhibitors were present in 71% (24 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas, but only 33% (7 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas. These results demonstrated that the inhibitor response in hemophiliacs was more complex and the epitope specificity was somewhat different. A comparison of hemophiliacs treated only with plasma fVIII or recombinant fVIII showed no significant differences in the complexity of the inhibitor response, as ≥ 2 different inhibitor antibodies were present in 78% (18 of 23) of the former and 82% (9 of 11) of the latter. In contrast, the major inhibitors in 35% (8 of 23) of hemophiliacs treated with plasma fVIII were directed against C2 and another LCh epitope within residues 1649-2137, but not A2, while none (0 of 11) treated with recombinant fVIII had this pattern.