BACKGROUND Concurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy followed by maintenance temozolomide is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, is currently approved for recurrent glioblastoma. Whether the addition of bevacizumab would improve survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is not known. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we treated adults who had centrally confirmed glioblastoma with radiotherapy (60 Gy) and daily temozolomide. Treatment with bevacizumab or placebo began during week 4 of radiotherapy and was continued for up to 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. At disease progression, the assigned treatment was revealed, and bevacizumab therapy could be initiated or continued. The trial was designed to detect a 25% reduction in the risk of death and a 30% reduction in the risk of progression or death, the two coprimary end points, with the addition of bevacizumab. RESULTS A total of 978 patients were registered, and 637 underwent randomization. There was no significant difference in the duration of overall survival between the bevacizumab group and the placebo group (median, 15.7 and 16.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio for death in the bevacizumab group, 1.13). Progression-free survival was longer in the bevacizumab group (10.7 months vs. 7.3 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.79). There were modest increases in rates of hypertension, thromboembolic events, intestinal perforation, and neutropenia in the bevacizumab group. Over time, an increased symptom burden, a worse quality of life, and a decline in neurocognitive function were more frequent in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSIONS First-line use of bevacizumab did not improve overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Progression-free survival was prolonged but did not reach the prespecified improvement target.

A B S T R A C T PurposeRadiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients and MethodsThis phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of Ն 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. ResultsA total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P ϭ .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P ϭ .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P Ͻ .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P Ͻ .001), and response (P ϭ .012). There was increased grade Ն 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P Ͻ .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. ConclusionThis study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.

A nomogram that assesses individualized survival probabilities (6-, 12-, and 24-mo) for patients with newly diagnosed GBM could be useful to health care providers for counseling patients regarding treatment decisions and optimizing therapeutic approaches. Free software for implementing this nomogram is provided: http://cancer4.case.edu/rCalculator/rCalculator.html.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have recently emerged as a novel treatment for cancer. These agents, transforming the field of oncology, are not devoid of toxicity and cause immune-related side effects which can involve any organ including the nervous system. In this study, we present 9 patients (7 men and 2 women) with neurologic complications secondary to ICPI treatment. These included meningoencephalitis, limbic encephalitis, polyradiculitis, cranial polyneuropathy, myasthenic syndrome and myositis. Four patients received dual ICPI therapy comprised of programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic lymphocyte associated protein-4 blocking antibodies. Median time to onset of neurologic adverse event during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was 8 weeks (range 5 days-19 weeks). In all patients ICPIs were stopped and corticosteroids were initiated, resulting in a marked improvement in seven out of nine patients. Two patients, one with myositis and one with myasthenic syndrome, died. In two patients ICPI therapy was resumed after resolution of the neurological adverse event with no additional neurologic complications. This series highlights the very broad spectrum of neurological complications of ICPIs, emphasizes the need for expedited diagnosis and suggests that withholding treatment early, accompanied with steroid therapy, carries the potential of complete resolution of the neurological immune-mediated condition. Thus, a high level of suspicion and rapid initiation of corticosteroids are mandatory to prevent uncontrolled clinical deterioration, which might be fatal.