No abstract

BACKGROUND Concurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy followed by maintenance temozolomide is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, is currently approved for recurrent glioblastoma. Whether the addition of bevacizumab would improve survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is not known. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we treated adults who had centrally confirmed glioblastoma with radiotherapy (60 Gy) and daily temozolomide. Treatment with bevacizumab or placebo began during week 4 of radiotherapy and was continued for up to 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. At disease progression, the assigned treatment was revealed, and bevacizumab therapy could be initiated or continued. The trial was designed to detect a 25% reduction in the risk of death and a 30% reduction in the risk of progression or death, the two coprimary end points, with the addition of bevacizumab. RESULTS A total of 978 patients were registered, and 637 underwent randomization. There was no significant difference in the duration of overall survival between the bevacizumab group and the placebo group (median, 15.7 and 16.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio for death in the bevacizumab group, 1.13). Progression-free survival was longer in the bevacizumab group (10.7 months vs. 7.3 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.79). There were modest increases in rates of hypertension, thromboembolic events, intestinal perforation, and neutropenia in the bevacizumab group. Over time, an increased symptom burden, a worse quality of life, and a decline in neurocognitive function were more frequent in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSIONS First-line use of bevacizumab did not improve overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Progression-free survival was prolonged but did not reach the prespecified improvement target.

Background Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have high survival rates when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab, an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, can preserve high survival rates and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. Methods In a randomized, non-inferiority, multicenter trial, patients with locoregionally-advanced p16-positive OPC were stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer T (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4) and N (N0-N2a vs. N2b-N3), Zubrod Performance Status (0 vs. 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤ vs. >10 pack-years) and randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy plus cetuximab 400 milligrams per square meter of body surface area (mg/m2), followed by 250 mgs/m2 for seven weekly doses or cisplatin 100 mgs/m2 for two doses, 21 days apart. The sample size was 800 eligible patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with non-inferiority margin 1.45 (hazard ratio). Findings From June 2011 through July 2014, 849 patients (805 eligible; 399 cetuximab; 406 cisplatin) were randomized at 182 centers in the United States and Canada. With median follow-up 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criterion for OS. Estimated 5-year OS was 77·9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73·4-82·5) in cetuximab group versus 84·6% (95%CI=80·6-88·6) in cisplatin group (hazard ratio [HR], 1·45, 1-sided 95% upper CI, 1·94; non-inferiority p=0·5056; 1-sided log-rank p=0.0163). PFS was significantly lower in cetuximab group than in cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95%CI=1·29-2·29; 5-year rates, 67·3% vs. 78·4%), and LRF was significantly higher (HR 2·05, 95%CI=1·35-3·10; 5-year rates, 17·3% vs. 9·9%). The rate of moderate-to-severe toxicity that was acute (77·4% vs. 81·7%, p=0·1586) and late (16·5 vs. 20·4%, p=0·1904) was similar in the cetuximab and cisplatin groups, respectively. Interpretation For patients with HPV-positive OPC, radiotherapy plus cetuximab demonstrated inferior OS and PFS compared to radiotherapy plus cisplatin; toxicity rates were similar (NCT01302834). Funding National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly and The Oral Cancer Foundation