In this paper we present the costs of defensive medicine in thirty-five clinical specialties to determine whether malpractice liability reforms would greatly reduce health care costs. Defensive medicine includes tests and procedures ordered by physicians principally to reduce perceived threats of medical malpractice liability. The practice is commonly assumed to increase health care costs. The results of studies of the costs of defensive medicine have been inconsistent. We found that estimated savings resulting from a 10 percent decline in medical malpractice premiums would be less than 1 percent of total medical care costs in every specialty. These savings are lower than most previous estimates, and they suggest that the presumed impact of tort reform on health care costs may be overstated.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new web-based intermittent catheter self-management intervention. Design We tested the acceptability and usability of intervention components, which included multiple web-based materials (an online urinary diary adapted for mobile phone use and an educational booklet), three phone calls with a nurse, and a peer led discussion forum. Subjects and setting Thirty adults with spinal cord injury using an intermittent catheter for bladder drainage were enrolled; 26 participants received the nurses’ phone based consultations. Methods Preliminary effectiveness of new self-efficacy and self-management scales were evaluated using baseline and three month online surveys. Participants’ perceived value of the intervention components, self-management changes, and suggestions were assessed with data from the three month surveys followed by brief tape-recorded interviews. Results Several catheter practices improved somewhat over three months including. The frequency of catheterizations every 4–6 hours increased from 71% to 77%. Self-management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction increased significantly (P= .032); participant comments indicated that fluid intake was the biggest change. Catheter related self-efficacy and quality of life scores increased. The frequency of urinary tract infection and pain did not change significantly. For feasibility, intervention components, with the exception of the forum, were rated highly by the majority of participants for usefulness, satisfaction (desired information), and web-based usability. Conclusion Further testing of this intervention is recommended in a multi-site randomized clinical trial.

Purpose Few studies have examined telehealth use among rural Medicaid beneficiaries. This study produced a descriptive overview of telehealth use in 2011, including the prevalence of telehealth use among rural and urban Medicaid beneficiaries, characteristics of telehealth users, types of telehealth services provided, and diagnoses associated with telehealth use. Methods Using data from the 2011 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), we conducted bivariate analyses to test the associations between rurality and prevalence and patterns of telehealth use among Medicaid beneficiaries. Findings Rural Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely to use telehealth services than their urban counterparts, but absolute rates of telehealth use were low—0.26% of rural nondual Medicaid beneficiaries used telehealth in 2011. Psychotropic medication management was the most prevalent use of telehealth for both rural and urban Medicaid beneficiaries, but the proportion of users who accessed nonbehavioral health services through telehealth was significantly greater as rurality increased. Regardless of telehealth users’ residence, mood disorders were the most common reason for obtaining telehealth services. As rurality increased, significantly higher proportions of telehealth users received services to address attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other behavioral health problems usually diagnosed in childhood. Conclusions These findings provide a baseline for further policy‐relevant investigations including examinations of changes in telehealth use rates in Medicaid since 2011. Reimbursement policies and unique rural service needs may account for the observed differences in rural‐urban Medicaid telehealth use rates.