Teenage suicide is a major public health concern, but its neurobiology is not well understood. Proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in stress and in the pathophysiology of depression—two major risk factors for suicide. Cytokines are increased in the serum of patients with depression and suicidal behavior; however, it is not clear if similar abnormality in cytokines occurs in brains of suicide victims. We therefore measured the gene and protein expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of 24 teenage suicide victims and 24 matched normal control subjects. Our results show that the mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were significantly increased in Brodmann area 10 (BA-10) of suicide victims compared with normal control subjects. These results suggest an important role for IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the pathophysiology of suicidal behavior and that proinflammatory cytokines may be an appropriate target for developing therapeutic agents.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired clinicobiological syndrome characterized by widespread activation of coagulation leading to fibrin deposition in the vasculature, organ dysfunction, consumption of clotting factors and platelets, and life-threatening hemorrhage. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is provoked by several underlying disorders (sepsis, cancer, trauma, and pregnancy complicated with eclampsia or other calamities). Treatment of the underlying disease and elimination of the trigger mechanism are the cornerstone therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic strategies specific for DIC aim to control activation of blood coagulation and bleeding risk. The clinical trials using DIC as entry criterion are limited. Large randomized, phase III clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of antithrombin (AT), activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and thrombomodulin (TM) in patients with sepsis, but the diagnosis of DIC was not part of the inclusion criteria. Treatment with APC reduced 28-day mortality of patients with severe sepsis, including patients retrospectively assigned to a subgroup with sepsis-associated DIC. Treatment with APC did not have any positive effects in other patient groups. The APC treatment increased the bleeding risk in patients with sepsis, which led to the withdrawal of this drug from the market. Treatment with AT failed to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, but a retrospective subgroup analysis suggested possible efficacy in patients with DIC. Clinical studies with recombinant TFPI or TM have been carried out showing promising results. The efficacy and safety of other anticoagulants (ie, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin) or transfusion of platelet concentrates or clotting factor concentrates have not been objectively assessed.

No abstract

No abstract

Unfractionated heparin has enjoyed the sole anticoagulant status for almost half a century. Besides an effective anticoagulant, this drug has been used in several additional indications. Despite the development of newer anticoagulant drugs, unfractionated heparin has remained the drug of choice for surgical anticoagulation and interventional cardiology. In the area of hematology and transfusion medicine, unfractionated heparin has continued to play a major role as an anticoagulant drug. The development of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) represents a refinement for the use of heparin. These drugs represent a class of depolymerized heparin derivatives with a distinct pharmacologic profile that is largely determined by their composition. These drugs produce their major effects by combining with antithrombin and exerting antithrombin and anti-Xa inhibition. In addition, the LMWHs also increase non-antithrombin-dependent effects such as TFPI release, modulation of adhesion molecules, and release of profibrinolytic and antithrombotic mediators from the blood vessels. The cumulative effects of each of the different LMWHs differ and each product exhibits a distinct profile. Initially these agents were developed for the prophylaxis of postsurgical deep-vein thrombosis. However, at this time these drugs are used not only for prophylaxis, but also for the treatment of thrombotic disorders of both the venous and arterial type. To a large extent, the LMWHs have replaced unfractionated heparin in most subcutaneous indications. With the use of these refined heparins, outpatient anticoagulant management has gone through a dramatic evolution. For the first time, patients with thrombotic disorders can be treated in an outpatient setting. Thus, the introduction of LMWHs represents a major advance in improving the use of heparin. The development of the oral formulation of heparin and LMWHs also provides an important area that may impact on the use of heparin and LMWHs. The increased awareness of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has necessitated the development of newer methods to identify patients at risk of developing this catastrophic syndrome. Furthermore, a strong interest has developed in alternate drugs or the management of patients with this syndrome. Despite the development of alternate anticoagulants that are mostly antithrombin derived (hirudins, hirulog), these agents have failed to provide similar clinical outcome as heparin in many indications. However, antithrombin drugs are useful in the anticoagulant management of heparin-compromised patients. The FDA has approved a recombinant hirudin (Refludan) and a synthetic antithrombin agent, argatroban (Novastan), for this indication. The development of synthetic heparin pentasaccharide and anti-Xa agents may have an impact on the prophylaxis of thrombotic disorders. However, these monotherapeutic agents do not mimic the polytherapeutic actions of heparin. Furthermore, these agents do not inhibit thrombin. Heparin and LMWHs are capable of inhibiting not only factor Xa an...