BackgroundRecruitment into clinical trials remains a key determinant to study completion and success. While various strategies have been proposed, it is unclear how they apply across different populations, diseases, and/or study goals. The ability to effectively overcome challenges may require different approaches that more broadly focus on addressing obstacles among sites that cannot be overcome by individual studies.MethodsThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) established the Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) as a consortium of sites to generate systematic site-level solutions to more efficiently recruit in CSP studies. Initial activities identified priorities and developed approaches through team-based efforts. Metrics were also developed to assess overall network performance.ResultsNetwork efforts produced several new strategies and best practices for common problems in CSP research. Recruitment strategies included bringing studies to patients and developing data programs using algorithms for finding eligible patients. Efficiency efforts focused on cross-training and standardizing performance reports.ConclusionNODES addressed site challenges in clinical trial recruitment and management by taking an overall approach that looked at the system rather than individual studies. Practices and operational changes were implemented for CSP research related to recruitment, staff training and research methodology. The network activities suggest that team-based development of tools and insights may help better identify targets and increase efficiencies for clinical trials recruitment.

Background Access to healthcare delivery programs and systems is a primary correlate to the overall health and well-being of Veterans and the general population. Participation in clinical research is a gateway to novel therapies that are intended to address current global health issues. Meeting or exceeding recruitment goals in clinical research is one of the key determinants of the timely and successful completion of a study. The travel and time burdens experienced by study participants are often considered barriers to their enrollment into clinical research. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) established a consortium of nine VA medical centers (VAMCs) called the Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES). The NODES program provides study site-level expertise and innovative approaches that address challenges to clinical research execution. In alignment with our mission, our program developed an approach to increase study participant access to clinical research through implementing “Mobile Recruitment (MoRe)” units. This manuscript describes the utility and challenges associated with employing this strategy to address three common barriers to clinical research participation: 1) research participant travel burden, 2) participant access to study opportunities, and 3) low participant enrollment. Methods A plan to introduce the Mobile Recruitment (MoRe) unit as a recruitment strategy was piloted for a high-volume, observational cohort study and mega biobank in the VA health care system, the “Million Veteran Program (MVP)”. MoRe is a recruitment strategy for CSP research integrating mobile technology and atypical research recruitment locations. Recruitment locations include primary or main VA hospitals and their assigned VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). Each Node site (n = 9) received components of the MoRe unit including a laptop, printer, portable cart with storage space, cooler/ice packs for specimen storage and transport. Each site's usage of these components varied based on its respective needs. Activities focused on both VA main facilities and CBOC facilities for recruitment. Results Seven of the nine Node sites compared the effectiveness of the MoRe unit on MVP study enrollment outcomes over three-time points: pre-intervention period, intervention period, and post-intervention period. The utilization of MoRe in the intervention period demonstrated a 36.9% increase in enrollment compared to the previous six months (pre-intervention period). There was a 2% enrollment increase at the six-month post-intervention period as compared to the intervention period. When comparing the pre-intervention period to the post-intervention period (duration of eighteen months), enrollment increased by 38.9%. Conclusion Five of the seven sites experienced an increase in enrollment during the intervention and post-intervention periods. The two sites without an increase in en...

No abstract

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate toxicity, response, time to progression, and overall survival in patients with recurrent or progressive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine. This two stages Simon design trial was stopped after 17 patients were enrolled and response rate did not reach a level to justify continuation to the second stage. One patient had received three previous chemotherapy combinations, 5 had two prior chemotherapy regimens, and the remaining 11 had been treated with one prior line of therapy. Their median age was 62 years (35-72). Vinorelbine was administered at 25 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 5 patients (33%) and 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia (20%). Three patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. No grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were seen. A total of 85 infusions were given, with 1 patient (6%) obtaining a partial response (PR) for a duration of 148 days. Three additional patients had stable disease (19%), but only in 1 patient for longer than 24 weeks. The median time to progression was 47 days for all patients (range 25-196). After a median follow-up of 184 days, 13 patients died (76%). Median overall survival was 164 days. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine has limited activity in relapsed SCLC.

ImportanceThe Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM) randomized clinical trial sought to recruit 50 000 adults into a study comparing colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality outcomes after randomization to either an annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or colonoscopy.ObjectiveTo (1) describe study participant characteristics and (2) examine who declined participation because of a preference for colonoscopy or stool testing (ie, fecal occult blood test [FOBT]/FIT) and assess that preference’s association with geographic and temporal factors.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study within CONFIRM, which completed enrollment through 46 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers between May 22, 2012, and December 1, 2017, with follow-up planned through 2028, comprised veterans aged 50 to 75 years with an average CRC risk and due for screening. Data were analyzed between March 7 and December 5, 2022.ExposureCase report forms were used to capture enrolled participant data and reasons for declining participation among otherwise eligible individuals.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDescriptive statistics were used to characterize the cohort overall and by intervention. Among individuals declining participation, logistic regression was used to compare preference for FOBT/FIT or colonoscopy by recruitment region and year.ResultsA total of 50 126 participants were recruited (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [6.9] years; 46 618 [93.0%] male and 3508 [7.0%] female). The cohort was racially and ethnically diverse, with 748 (1.5%) identifying as Asian, 12 021 (24.0%) as Black, 415 (0.8%) as Native American or Alaska Native, 34 629 (69.1%) as White, and 1877 (3.7%) as other race, including multiracial; and 5734 (11.4%) as having Hispanic ethnicity. Of the 11 109 eligible individuals who declined participation (18.0%), 4824 (43.4%) declined due to a stated preference for a specific screening test, with FOBT/FIT being the most preferred method (2820 [58.5%]) vs colonoscopy (1958 [40.6%]; P < .001) or other screening tests (46 [1.0%] P < .001). Preference for FOBT/FIT was strongest in the West (963 of 1472 [65.4%]) and modest elsewhere, ranging from 199 of 371 (53.6%) in the Northeast to 884 of 1543 (57.3%) in the Midwest (P = .001). Adjusting for region, the preference for FOBT/FIT increased by 19% per recruitment year (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.25).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional analysis of veterans choosing nonenrollment in the CONFIRM study, those who declined participation more often preferred FOBT or FIT over colonoscopy. This preference increased over time and was strongest in the western US and may provide insight into trends in CRC screening preferences.