OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the association between the depth of trophoblastic infiltration and serum vascular endothelial growth factorconcentration in patients with an ampullary pregnancy.METHODS:This prospective cross-sectionalstudy involved 34 patients with an ampullary ectopic pregnancy who underwent salpingectomy between 2012 and 2013. Maternal serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations were measured using Luminex technology. Trophoblastic invasion was classified histologically as follows: stage I, limited to the tubal mucosa; stage II, reaching the muscle layer; and stage III,involving the full thickness. The qualitative data were compared using Fisher's exact test. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to evaluate differences in serum vascular endothelial growth factor among the degrees of trophoblastic invasion. ROC curves were constructed to determine vascular endothelial growth factor cut-off values that predict the degree of tubal invasion based on the best sensitivity and specificity.RESULTS:Eight patients had stage I trophoblastic invasion, seven had stage II, and 19 had stage III. The median serum vascular endothelial growth factorconcentration was 69.88 pg/mL for stage I, 14.53 pg/mL for stage II and 9.08 pg/mL for stage III, with a significant difference between stages I and III. Based on the ROC curve, a serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentration of 25.9 pg/mL best differentiated stage I from stages II and III with asensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 76.9%, and area under the curve of 0.798.CONCLUSIONS:The depth of trophoblastic penetration into the tubal wall isassociated with serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentration in ampullary pregnancies.

Introduction: The factors that modulate trophoblastic invasion into the tubal wall remain uncertain. Moreover, it is known that the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is increased in cases of deeper trophoblastic invasion in the fallopian tubes.Objective: This study aimed to assess if there is a correlation between VEGF tissue expression and the depth of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in patients with ampullary pregnancy.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with a diagnosis of tubal pregnancy in the ampullary region who underwent salpingectomy. Inclusion criteria were spontaneously conceived singleton pregnancies, diagnosis of tubal pregnancy in the ampullary region, and radical surgical treatment. A lack of agreement regarding the location of the tubal pregnancy and impossibility of either anatomopathological or tissue VEGF analysis were the exclusion criteria. Histologically, trophoblastic invasion into the tubal wall was classified as grade I when limited to the tubal mucosa, grade II when it reached the muscle layer, and grade III when it comprised the full thickness of the tubal wall. A total of 42 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected to participate in the study. Eight patients were excluded. After surgery, tissue VEGF expression was measured by immunohistochemistry and the point counting technique.Results: Histological analysis revealed that eight patients had stage I tubal infiltration, seven had stage II, and 19 had stage III. The difference between the percentage of VEGF expression in the trophoblastic tissue was not significant in relation to the degree of trophoblastic invasion (p = 0.621) (ANOVA). Trophoblastic tissue VEGF showed no statistical difference for prediction of both degrees of trophoblastic invasion (univariate multinomial regression).Conclusion: The depth of trophoblastic penetration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancies is not associated with tissue VEGF expression.

No abstract