No abstract

Purpose of reviewObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition affecting about 1 billion people worldwide. The first line therapy for most patients with OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. However, there are significant limitations with long-term adherence to CPAP therapy, which may be as low as 30–60%.Recent findingElectrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has been studied in recent years. It achieves upper airway patency by causing a contraction of the genioglossus muscle, the strongest dilator of the upper airway, and by maintaining its neuromuscular tone in the asleep patient with OSA. Electrical stimulation can be delivered invasively, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS), and noninvasively, transcutaneous electrical stimulation in OSA (TESLA). However, randomised controlled trials, the STAR and the TESLA trial, have provided promising results on efficacy and safety of the methods.SummaryPatient and public involvement underlines the interest in TESLA and HNS and highlights the need to provide non-CPAP therapeutic options to those who may find it difficult to cope with first line therapies. The relatively low costs and the favourable safety profile of the TESLA approach provide the chance to offer this treatment to patients with OSA following further development of the evidence.

Background: Electrical current can be used to stimulate upper airway dilator muscles to treat obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Ultrasound devices are widely available and may be used to detect contraction of the upper airway dilator muscles assessing the functionality of electrical stimulation (ES) used for this treatment. Methods: In a physiological sub-study of a randomised controlled trial, patients with OSA underwent ultrasound examination to assess contraction of the upper airway dilator muscles in response to transcutaneous ES. Ultrasound scans were scored according to the picture quality (poor = '0', acceptable = '1' and good = '2'). Tongue base thickness was assessed in mid-sagittal and coronal planes with (D2, A2) and without ES (D1, A1), while awake and seated. The primary outcome was to determine the increase in tongue thickness during ES in both views (D2 -D1 = ΔD), as well as any increase in the cross-sectional area (CSA) in the coronal view (A2 -A1 = ΔA). Data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: Fourteen patients [eight male, age 57.5 (9.8) years, body mass index (BMI) 29.5 (2.8) kg/m 2 ]with OSA [Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) 19.5 (10.6) × hour -1 ] were studied. Quality of the ultrasound scans was acceptable or good with 1.5 (0.5) points. In the mid-sagittal plane, ΔD was +0.17 (0.07) cm in midline and +0.21 (0.09) cm in the widest diameter, a percentual change of 12.2% (4%) and 12.8% (5.2%) (P<0.001, respectively). In the coronal plane, ΔD was +0.17 (0.04) cm, an increase of 12.3% (4.6%) (P<0.001, respectively), ΔA in the CSA increased by +18.9% (3.0%) with stimulation (P<0.001). There was a negative correlation between age and ΔA (r= -0.6, P=0.03), but no significant associations were found with gender, BMI, neck circumference, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), AHI, skin and subcutaneous tissue in the submental area.Conclusions: Ultrasound can visualise upper airway dilator muscle contraction during transcutaneous ES in awake patients with OSA. Contraction is best detected in the CSA of the tongue base in the coronal plane.