Background and objectivesIn children with nephrotic syndrome, steroids are the cornerstone of therapy for relapse. The adequate duration and dosage of steroids, however, have not been an active area of research, especially in children with infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. This study investigated the efficacy of an abbreviated regimen for treatment of a relapse in this population.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsIn a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of prednisolone as a “short regimen” (40 mg/m2 on alternate days for 2 weeks) compared with “standard regimen” (40 mg/m2 on alternate days for 4 weeks) for children aged 1–16 years who achieved remission of a relapse. The primary outcome was the proportion of children developing frequent relapses or steroid dependence at 12 months.ResultsA total of 117 patients were enrolled and randomized to short (55) or standard (62) regimen. Fourteen (24%) patients in standard regimen and 12 (23%) in short regimen developed frequent relapses or steroid dependence over a period of 1 year (risk difference, −1%; 95% confidence interval, −15 to 16; P=0.90). A large 95% confidence interval crossed the proposed noninferiority margin. In a time to event analysis, there was no significant difference in the proportion of children developing frequent relapses or steroid dependence and time to outcome between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.23; P=0.98). Time to relapse, relapse rate, and steroid-related adverse events were similar in both groups. Cumulative steroid exposure was significantly lower in the short regimen (risk difference, −541 mg/m2; 95% confidence interval, −917 to −164 mg/m2; P<0.001).ConclusionsIn children with infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome, a short steroid treatment for relapse resulted in a similar proportion of patients developing frequent relapses or steroid dependence; however, noninferiority of a short regimen was not established.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:CTRI/2015/11/006345

Fogging inside the safety goggles is a common problem experienced by more healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic than ever. Various anti-fogging remedies are available on the market. We have adopted a low-cost alternative that can be extremely useful in resource-limited settings.

No abstract

No abstract