Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the shoulder by itself is an uncommon condition. We report osteonecrosis of the bilateral shoulder in a 45 year old man with no particular risk factors accompanied by pain and range of motion restriction.
Background: Osteoarthritis of the knee is one of the most common degenerative diseases and the fourth leading cause of years lived with disability at the global level. This study assessed the efficacy of plateletrich plasma (PRP) in osteoarthritis of knees as to changes in cartilage thickness and clinical and functional outcomes.Methods: Thirty participants with Kellgren-Lawrence grade two and grade three osteoarthritis knee who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this prospective interventional study after taking written informed consent. Each participant received three doses of two ml intraarticular platelet-rich plasma at an interval of seven days. Clinical assessment was determined using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) on Day 0, Day 90, and Day 180. Cartilage thickness (femoral and trochlear cartilage) was measured pre (Day 0) and post-PRP (Day 180) under ultrasound guidance.Results: The mean VAS score for pain was 7.4 before treatment which changed to 5.3 (p= <0.0001) on Day 90 and 3.37 (p= <0.0001) on Day 180 post-PRP. The mean total KOOS was 19.16 ± 10.73 before treatment which improved to 37.42 ± 9.88 (p= <0.0001) and 49.98 ± 8.82 (p= <0.0001) at 90 days, and 180 days post-injection, respectively. The mean cartilage thickness (femoral and trochlear cartilage) improved from baseline (day 0) to final follow-up on day 180, which was statistically significant and implied cartilage repair following PRP administration.Conclusion: This study supports the efficacy of PRP in the management of osteoarthritis knee by improvement in pain, joint stiffness, and activities of daily living, as well as aids in the repair and regeneration of articular cartilage.
Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Neuroimaging plays a critical role in diagnosing and planning the treatment of stroke. Early prognostic markers help in predicting the prognosis after stroke. Aim: To correlate the motor recovery and functional outcome with Computed Tomography (CT) brain findings using Alberta Stroke Programme Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) in patients with ischaemic stroke. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital (tertiary care centre), from October 2016 to March 2018. A total of 45 patients diagnosed with Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) territory Ischaemic Stroke were included. Motor and functional assessment were done using Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel Index (BI). FMA and BI were correlated with the radiological assessment using ASPECTS on Non Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) of head. Results: The mean age of the study population was 60.98±8.61 years. The mean BI score was 70.34± 25.2, and FMA score was 61.56±32.8. The mean ASPECTS was 7.5, with 26 patients having ASPECTS 8-10 and 19 with ASPECTS 0-7. Patients with higher ASPECTS (8-10) had moderate to no dependence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and mild to no motor impairment respectively (p-value<0.0001). Patients having lower ASPECTS (0-7) had severe dependency in ADL and motor impairment (p-value<0.0001). Conclusion: Alberta stroke programme early computed tomography score has a significant correlation with motor and functional recovery and is a strong predictor of outcome after ischaemic stroke. The higher the score on ASPECTS, the better will be the motor and functional outcome. The computed tomography findings of brain will help in stroke rehabilitation by enabling to set realistic goals at an early (acute) stage poststroke.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.