Background Limited access to HIV testing of children impedes early diagnosis and access to antiretroviral therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of routine pediatric HIV testing in an urban, fee-for-service, outpatient clinic in Durban, South Africa. Methods We assessed the number of patients (0–15 years) who underwent HIV testing upon physician referral during a baseline period. We then established a routine, voluntary HIV testing study for pediatric patients, regardless of symptoms. Parents/caretakers were offered free rapid fingerstick HIV testing of their child. For patients <18 months, the biological mother was offered HIV testing and HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the infant’s status. The primary outcome was the HIV testing yield, defined as the average number of positive tests per month during the routine compared with the baseline period. Results Over a 5-month baseline testing period, 931 pediatric patients registered for outpatient care. Of the 124 (13%) patients who underwent testing on physician referral, 21 (17%, 95% confidence interval: 11–25%) were HIV infected. During a 13-month routine testing period, 2790 patients registered for care and 2106 (75%) were approached for participation. Of these, 1234 were eligible and 771 (62%) enrolled. Among those eligible, 637 (52%, 95% confidence interval: 49–54%) accepted testing of their child or themselves (biological mothers of infants <18 months). There was an increase in the average number of HIV tests during the routine compared with the baseline HIV testing periods (49 versus 25 tests/month, P = 0.001) but no difference in the HIV testing yield during the testing periods (3 versus 4 positive HIV tests/month, P = 0.06). However, during the routine testing period, HIV prevalence remains extraordinarily high with 39 (6%, 95% confidence interval: 4–8%) newly diagnosed HIV-infected children (median 7 years, 56% female). Conclusions Targeted and symptom-based testing referral identifies an equivalent number of HIV-infected children as routine HIV testing. Routine HIV testing identifies a high burden of HIV and is a feasible and moderately acceptable strategy in an outpatient clinic in a high prevalence area.

Background Electronic clinical decision-making support systems (eCDSS) aim to assist clinicians making complex patient management decisions and improve adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Integrated management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) provides guidelines for management of sick children attending primary health care clinics and is widely implemented globally. An electronic version of IMCI (eIMCI) was developed in South Africa. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing management of sick children with eIMCI to the management when using paper-based IMCI (pIMCI) in one district in KwaZulu-Natal. From 31 clinics in the district, 15 were randomly assigned to intervention (eIMCI) or control (pIMCI) groups. Computers were deployed in eIMCI clinics, and one IMCI trained nurse was randomly selected to participate from each clinic. eIMCI participants received a one-day computer training, and all participants received a similar three-day IMCI update and two mentoring visits. A quantitative survey was conducted among mothers and sick children attending participating clinics to assess the quality of care provided by IMCI practitioners. Sick child assessments by participants in eIMCI and pIMCI groups were compared to assessment by an IMCI expert. Results Self-reported computer skills were poor among all nurse participants. IMCI knowledge was similar in both groups. Among 291 enrolled children: 152 were in the eIMCI group; 139 in the pIMCI group. The mean number of enrolled children was 9.7 per clinic (range 7–12). eIMCI consultations took longer than pIMCI consultations (median duration 28 minutes vs 25 minutes; p = 0.02). eIMCI participants were less likely than pIMCI participants to correctly classify children for presenting symptoms, but were more likely to correctly classify for screening conditions (TB, HIV and nutrition). However, this did not increase identification of children who screened positive. eIMCI participants were less likely to provide all required medications (124/152; 81.6% vs 126/139; 91.6%, p = 0.026), and more likely to prescribe unnecessary medication (48/152; 31.6% vs 20/139; 14.4%, p = 0.004) compared to pIMCI participants. Conclusions Implementation of eIMCI failed to improve management of sick children, with poor IMCI implementation in both groups. Further research is needed to understand barriers to comprehensive implementation of both pIMCI and eIMCI. (350) Clinical Trials Registration: BFC157/19