Medullary carcinoma of thyroid is a relatively uncommon malignancy, which can be sporadic and syndromic in nature. It commonly spreads to regional lymph nodes followed by spreading to distant sites. Breast is an uncommon site of metastasis of this malignancy. Our case is a 38‐year‐old woman married parous woman presenting to the outpatient department with complaints of lump in both the breasts. Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) was attempted, which revealed a malignancy more suggestive of a metastasis, which was confirmed on CT scan. A detailed history revealed that the patient is a known case of medullary carcinoma of thyroid. The report was given as metastatic medullary carcinoma to the breast after confirming with a calcitonin immunostain. Given the versatility of primary lesions in the breast, minimally invasive FNA cytology (FNAC) technique with adequate sampling helps in identifying metastatic lesions. Differentiating primary from metastatic lesions changes the course of management to the patient. Metastatic lesions should always be kept in mind in the occurrence of known malignancies, however rare the site of occurrence may be. Morphological clues and immunohistochemical work up aid in arriving at correct diagnosis.
Breast J. 2020;26:743-747. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tbj | 743 AbstractMastalgia affects premenopausal in which cyclical mastalgia affects up to 40% of women. In approximately 8% of these women, pain will be severe and interfere with their normal activities. oral tamoxifen widely used in the treatment of mastalgia is associated with a wide range of side effects. Topical tamoxifen has the potential to be a more efficacious and safer alternative with lower blood drug levels hence having lower systemic side effects. To compare reduction in the pain, nodularity and blood drug levels of tamoxifen using topical verus oral tamoxifen in cyclical mastalgia. Patients who presented to the surgery outpatient department with complaints of breast pain were provided with a breast pain evaluation questionnaire. Patients were randomized using a computer generated sequence into two groups with 75 participants in each group. In Group 1, the participants received topical tamoxifen gel and a placebo tablet for 3 months, and in Group 2, the participants received Oral Tab Tamoxifen 10 mg OD and a placebo gel for 3 months. They were provided with a Cardiff Breast Pain assessment chart and asked to mark the severity of their pain and response to treatment in the following month and asked to report to the investigator.Patients were called for review every month, and the pain chart was monitored and documented. The response to therapy (relief of pain) was assessed after 3 months of treatment and once more at the end of 6 months for recurrence. After completion of 1 month of treatment, blood sample was drawn to check for the blood drug levels. There is a significant difference of mean pain score between oral and topical tamoxifen groups (P < .001) at the end of 1 month, 3 months (P < .001), and 6 months (P < .001). There is a significant difference in the Nodularity found between oral and topical groups at presentation (P = .004), at 1 month (P = .003) and at 6 months (P < .001). There is a significant difference of mean blood tamoxifen level (ng/mL) in oral and topical tamoxifen groups (P < .001). From this study, we conclude that topical tamoxifen is more effective than oral tamoxifen treatment in reducing cyclical breast pain and decreasing breast nodularity with lesser side effects and lower recurrence rates. K E Y W O R D Sbreast nodularity, mastalgia, oral tamoxifen, side effect profile, topical tamoxifen
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.