Gastric cancer and liver cancer are among the most common malignancies and the leading causes of death worldwide, due to late detection and high recurrence rates. Today, these cancers have a heavy socioeconomic burden, for which a full understanding of their pathophysiological features is warranted to search for promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Osteopontin (OPN) is overexpressed in most patients with gastric and liver cancers. Over the past decade, emerging evidence has revealed a correlation of OPN level and clinicopathological features and prognosis in gastric and liver cancers, indicating its potential as an independent prognostic indicator in such patients. Functional studies have verified the potential of OPN knockdown as a therapeutic approach in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, OPN mediates multifaceted roles in the interaction between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment, in which many details need further exploration. OPN signaling results in various functions, including prevention of apoptosis, modulation of angiogenesis, malfunction of tumor-associated macrophages, degradation of extracellular matrix, activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt and nuclear factor-κB pathways, which lead to tumor formation and progression, particularly in gastric and liver cancers. This editorial aims to review recent findings on alteration in OPN expression and its clinicopathological associations with tumor progression, its potential as a therapeutic target, and putative mechanisms in gastric and liver cancers. Better understanding of the implications of OPN in tumorigenesis might facilitate development of therapeutic regimens to benefit patients with these deadly malignancies.
Although there are many reports of in vivo tendon engineering using different animal models, only a few studies involve the short-term investigation of in vitro tendon engineering. Our previous study demonstrated that functional tendon tissue could be engineered in vivo in a hen model using tenocytes and polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers. This current study explored the feasibility of in vitro tendon engineering using the same type of cells and scaffold material. Tenocytes were extracted from the tendons of a hen's foot with enzyme digestion and cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS. Unwoven PGA fibers were arranged into a cord-like construct and fixed on a U-shape spring, and tenocytes were then seeded on PGA fibers to generate a cell-PGA construct. In experimental group 1, 22 cell-scaffold constructs were fixed on the spring with no tension and collected at weeks 4 (n = 7), 6 (n = 7) and 10 (n = 8); in experimental group 2, five cell-scaffold constructs were fixed on the spring with a constant strain and collected after 6 weeks of culture. In the control group, three cell-free scaffolds were fixed on the spring without tension. The collected engineered tendons were subjected to gross and histological examinations and biomechanical analysis. The results showed that tendon tissue could be generated during in vitro culture. In addition, the tissue structure and mechanical property became more mature and stronger with the increase of culture time. Furthermore, application of constant strain could enhance tissue maturation and improve mechanical property of the in vitro engineered tendon (1.302 +/- 0.404 Mpa with tension vs 0.406 +/- 0.030 Mpa without tension at 6 weeks). Nevertheless, tendon engineered with constant strain appeared much thinner in its diameter than tendon engineered without mechanical loading. Additionally, its collagen fibers were highly compacted when compared to natural tendon structure, suggesting that constant strain may not be the optimal means of mechanical load. Thus, application of dynamic mechanical load with a bioreactor to the construction of tendon tissue will be our next goal in this series of in vitro tendon engineering study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.