The effect of low titers of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected only by sensitive solid-phase assays (SPAs) on renal transplant outcomes is unclear. We report the results of a systematic review and metaanalysis of rejection rates and graft outcomes for renal transplant recipients with such preformed DSAs, defined by positive results on SPA but negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatch results. Our search identified seven retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1119 patients, including 145 with isolated DSA-SPA. Together, these studies suggest that the presence of DSA-SPA, despite a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result, nearly doubles the risk for antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.89; P,0.001) and increases the risk for graft failure by 76% (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; P=0.01). These results suggest that donor selection should consider the presence of antibodies in the recipient, identified by the SPA, even in the presence of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result. In 1969, Patel and Terasaki published their landmark study that definitively established the detrimental effect of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch on short-term allograft survival, but they noted the limited sensitivity of the technique in the detection of preformed DSAs. 1 Since that time, technological advances have led to increasingly more sensitive tests for the detection of anti-HLA DSAs, including flow cytometry crossmatch and the more recent solid-phase assays (SPAs), such as Luminex. 2,3 The clinical significance of DSAs detected by sensitive SPA remains unclear, with disparate findings being reported in the literature. 4 Further, the clinical utility of these tests, particularly for prognostication or modifying immunosuppressive therapy, when used individually or in some sequential manner remains unclear. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports of rejection rates and graft outcomes among renal transplant recipients with preformed DSA at levels detectable only by SPA but not by CDC or flow crossmatch. RESULTSWe ultimately identified seven studies that met our inclusion criteria for the primary quantitative analysis (group 1). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] All seven studies were retrospective cohort studies; three were from the United States and four from Europe. Our ability to compare

No abstract

Half of the recovered expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are discarded in the United States. A new kidney allocation system offers kidneys at higher risk of discard, Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) >85%, to a wider geographic area to promote broader sharing and expedite utilization. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) based on the KDPI is a potential option to streamline allocation of kidneys which otherwise would have been discarded. To assess the clinical utility of the KDPI in kidneys at higher risk of discard, we analyzed the OPTN/UNOS Registry that included the deceased donor kidneys recovered between 2002 and 2012. The primary outcomes were allograft survival, patient survival and discard rate based on different KDPI categories (<80%, 80–90% and >90%). Kidneys with KDPI >90% were associated with increased odds of discard (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.74–2.29) compared to ones with KDPI <80%. DKTs of KDPI >90% were associated with lower overall allograft failure (HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.89) and better patient survival (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.98) compared to single ECD kidneys with KDPI >90%. Kidneys at higher risk of discard may be offered in the up-front allocation system as a DKT. Further modeling and simulation studies are required to determine a reasonable KDPI cutoff percentile.

Background and objectivesOutcomes of kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 as outpatients have not been described.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe obtained clinical data for 41 consecutive outpatient kidney transplant recipients with known or suspected coronavirus disease 2019. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare characteristics of patients who required hospitalization versus those who did not.ResultsOf 41 patients, 22 (54%) had confirmed coronavirus disease 2019, and 19 (46%) were suspected cases. Patients most commonly reported fever (80%), cough (56%), and dyspnea (39%). At the end of follow-up, 13 patients (32%) required hospitalization a median of 8 days (range, 1–16) after symptom onset, and 23 (56%) had outpatient symptom resolution a median of 12 days (4–23) after onset. Patients who required hospitalization were more likely to have reported dyspnea (77% versus 21%, P=0.003) and had higher baseline creatinine (median, 2.0 versus 1.3 mg/dl, P=0.02), but there were no other differences between groups.ConclusionsIn an early cohort of outpatient kidney transplant recipients with known or suspected coronavirus disease 2019, many had symptomatic resolution without requiring hospitalization.