Purpose: Human papillomavirus16 (HPV-16) has been implicated as a causative agent in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). This study was undertaken to discern the distribution and timing of HPV viral integration during tumorigenesis of the upper respiratory tract. Experimental Design: A tissue array was assembled from a consecutive group of 176 patients with HNSCCs. The array was evaluated by HPV-16 in situ hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry. Patients with HPV-positive tonsillar cancers who had undergone bilateral tonsillectomies were selected for more complete mapping of viral integration. Results: HPV-16 was detected in 38 of the 176 (22%) cases by in situ hybridization. When stratified by site of origin, HPV-16 was detected in 37 of 45 cancers arising from the oropharynx but in only 1of 131tumors arising from nonoropharyngeal sites (82% versus 0.8%, P < 0.00001).P16 expression was associated with the presence of HPV-16: 31 of 38 HPV-positive tumors exhibited p16 expression, whereas only 9 of the 138 HPV-negative tumors were p16-positive (82% versus 6%, P < 0.00001). In the bilateral tonsil sections, hybridization signals were strictly limited to the invasive cancers and associated dysplasias. P16 staining was widely distributed throughout the nonneoplastic crypt epithelium of individuals with and without tonsillar cancer. Conclusions: HPV-16 is strongly associated with carcinomas arising from the oropharynx, and integration is tightly coupled to the neoplastic process.Viral integration does not occur as a field alteration throughout normal tonsillar epithelium. P16 expression localizes to HPV-positive cancers, and is intrinsic to the specialized epithelium of the tonsillar crypts. For risk assessment, early cancer detection and disease surveillance, evidence of HPV-16 integration may represent a meaningful finding, whereas high p16 expression, by itself, may not.

ALT and DAXX/ATRX loss in PanNETs was associated with shorter DFS and DSS and likely plays a significant role in driving metastatic disease. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 600-9. ©2016 AACR.

The diagnosis of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) sometimes can be challenging without ancillary markers. Here we performed an immunohistochemical study of a novel stem cell marker SALL4 in a large series of 110 primary testicular GCTs (65 pure and 45 mixed) containing the following types of tumors and/or tumor components: 50 intratubular germ cell neoplasias (ITGCNs), 62 classic seminomas, 2 spermatocytic seminomas, 39 embryonal carcinomas (EC), 5 pediatric and 26 postpubertal yolk sac tumors (YST), 7 pediatric and 25 postpubertal teratomas, and 5 choriocarcinomas. We compared SALL4 with OCT4 in all GCTs, and SALL4 to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and glypican-3 in all YSTs. To test SALL4 specificity, 23 testicular non-GCTs (10 Leydig cell tumors, 4 Sertoli cell tumors, 3 adenomatoid tumors, 3 paratesticular rhabdomyosarcomas, 2 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, and 1 rete testis papillary cystadenoma) and 275 nontesticular tumors (158 metastatic carcinomas, 12 metastatic melanomas, 11 primary and 2 metastatic mesotheliomas, and 72 primary and 20 metastatic sarcomas) were also stained for SALL4. All ITGCNs, classic seminomas, and ECs demonstrated strong SALL4 and OCT4 staining in more than 90% tumor cells. All 31 YSTs (5 pediatric and 26 postpubertal) showed strong positive SALL4 staining in more than 90% tumor cells but had negative OCT4 staining. Both spermatocytic seminomas showed positive SALL4 staining in 80% to 95% tumor cells in all 3 types of tumor cells with weak-to-moderate staining intensity. Mononucleated trophoblastic cells were variably positive for SALL4 staining in all 5 choriocarcinomas. Focal SALL4 staining was seen in 4 of 7 pediatric and 23 of 27 postpubertal teratomas. OCT4 staining was not seen in any spermatocytic seminoma, choriocarcinoma, or teratoma. No SALL4 staining was seen in all 23 testicular non-GCTs. Of 275 nontesticular tumors, only 10 carcinomas and 1 sarcoma showed focal (<25% tumor cells) weak SALL4 staining. The only non-neoplastic cells within the testis stained with SALL4 were spermatogonia and few primary spermatocytes. AFP staining was seen in 29 of 31 YST but it was often focal and patchy. Although all 31 YSTs showed glypican-3 staining, 14 (45%) show staining in less than 30% tumor cells. Our findings indicate that SALL4 is a novel sensitive and relatively specific marker for testicular GCTs. SALL4 is a more sensitive marker than AFP and glypican-3 for YST.

Objective To explore the prognostic importance and preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in an effort to guide surgical decision making in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Background PNETs are uncommon, and the natural history of the disease is not well described. As a result, there remains controversy regarding the optimal management of regional lymph nodes during resection of the primary tumor. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgery for locoregional PNET between 1994 and 2012 was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of nodal metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Results were expressed as p- values and odds ratio estimates with 95% confidence intervals. Results One-hundred thirty six patients were identified, of whom 50 (38%) patients had nodal metastasis. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was higher for: larger tumors (> 1.5 cm (OR= 4.7), tumors of the head as compared to body-tail of the pancreas (OR= 2.8), tumors with Ki-67 > 20% (OR= 6.7), and tumors with lymph vascular invasion (OR= 3.6), (p value <0.05). Median DFS was lower for patients with nodal metastases (4.5 v 14.6 years, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Lymph node metastasis is predictive of poor outcomes in patients with PNETs. Preoperative variables are not able to reliably predict patients where the probability of lymph node involvement was less than 12%. These data support inclusion of regional lymphadenectmy in patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PNET.

Ovarian primitive germ cell tumors (GCTs) are uncommon tumors and sometimes pose diagnostic challenges. Among them, yolk sac tumor (YST) poses the greatest diagnostic difficulty and can be mistaken for clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Current immunohistochemical markers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), glypican-3, cytokeratin (CK) 7, and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) used to distinguish YST from CCC lack adequate sensitivity and specificity. Here by immunohistochemistry, we investigated a novel marker SALL4 in 98 GCTs (29 YSTs, 18 dysgerminomas, 6 gonadoblastomas, 6 embryonal carcinomas, 15 immature and 12 mature teratomas, 7 carcinoid tumors, 3 strumal carcinoids, and 2 struma ovarii) with particular interest of exploring SALL4 to distinguish YST from CCC. One hundred sixty-three non-GCTs including 45 CCCs were also stained. We found that SALL4 is strongly positive in more than 90% tumor cells in all YSTs, dysgerminomas, gonadoblastomas, and embryonal carcinomas. Variable SALL4 staining is seen in 11 of 15 immature teratomas. All other GCTs included in this study are negative for SALL4. Except 3 CCCs with focal SALL4 staining (<15% tumor cells), SALL4 is negative in the remaining 160 non-GCTs. We also compared SALL4 with AFP, glypican-3, CK7, and EMA in all YSTs and CCCs. AFP and glypican-3 are positive in 24 (83%) and 20 (69%) YSTs, respectively, whereas 16 (35%) and 13(28%) CCCs show positive AFP and glypican-3 staining, respectively. Three (10%) and 4 (14%) YSTs show focal (<2% tumor cells) CK7 and EMA staining, respectively. CK7 and EMA are positive in all 45 CCCs but 3 (7%) and 1 (2%) cases show staining in less than 30% tumor cells, respectively. Our findings indicate that SALL4 is a novel sensitive and specific marker for ovarian primitive GCTs. SALL4 is particularly useful in distinguishing YST from CCC and better than AFP, glypican-3, CK7, and EMA.