Background Nutritional knowledge assessment is an important component in nutrition research, and a prerequisite for the implementation of many policies and programs aimed at improving eating behavior. In order to generate objective results, validated tools for a given population must be employed. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of a nutrition knowledge questionnaire for Romanian adults. Methods Kleimann's version of a General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire, was translated and adapted to Romanian language, culture, and cuisine. The final format was developed in several steps and used four components: internal and external reliability were assessed in a general population sample (n1 = 412), respectively in a subgroup (n2 = 46) from Component 1; Component 3 assessed construct validity (n3 = 96) using the "known-groups" method; Component 4 (convergent validity, n4 = 508) tested the association between socio-demographic characteristics and nutrition knowledge. Results The overall internal reliability was 0.878 and the external reliability was >0.880 in all sections, and overall. Specialists had higher scores than nonspecialists, with a very large effect size. In the general population, females scored higher than males, and middle-aged and older adults scored higher than young adults. Higher scores were associated with higher levels of education. The characteristics of individuals prone to giving wrong answers were: males (beta = 0.170), high school or less (beta = 0.167), and no training in nutrition (beta = 0.154). Conclusions The Romanian version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for measuring nutrition knowledge in adults.

Rationale: Although dysgerminomas are relatively uncommon among all ovarian neoplasms, representing for only about 2%, they account for 32.8 percent of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Their association with pregnancy is extremely rare; due to the low frequency of occurrence, there are few recommendations regarding pregnancy management; therefore, it is important to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy. Patient concerns: We present the case of a 25 years patient, gestation 1, para 1, who was hospitalized in the clinic at 38/39 weeks of gestation at the beginning of labor. Following the ultrasound examination, a hypoechogenic lesion on the uterine fundus was found, suggestive of subterranean fibroid. After caesarean section, right adnexectomy was performed; the histopathological examination revealed, unexpectedly, the diagnosis of dysgerminoma. Diagnoses: Dysgerminoma as associated with pregnancy. Interventions: Birth by Caesarean section and right adnexectomy. No other medical complications occurred. Outcomes: The histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were consistent with the pure dysgerminoma. Oncology was staged AI, with the monitoring of markers and abdominal and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Lessons: Dysgerminoma is the most common ovarian malignancy associated with pregnancy with a good fetal maternal outcome. If these tumors are discovered accidentally during caesarean section, tumor markers and magnetic resonance imaging scanning should be done postoperatively to plan optimal treatment.

For the evaluation and non-invasive monitoring of patients with Alzheimer`s disease the expression of miRNAs can be successfully used.