Background: Drug concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are routinely determined from blood serum or plasma at trough levels (before intake of morning dose). In capillary blood collection, blood is taken from the fingertip with the aid of a disposable tool and dried on absorbent material. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique offers several advantages over the use of filter paper cards. The aim of this study was to determine conversion factors for the estimation of AED serum concentrations from capillary blood concentrations.Methods: Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from adult inpatients with epilepsy who were treated with lacosamide (LCM, n = 30), lamotrigine (LTG, n = 40), and/or levetiracetam (LEV, n = 36). A validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method for dried blood samples for these AEDs was compared with routine serum laboratory methods. Method agreement was evaluated using different regression techniques, and the conversion factors were calculated.Results: Regression analyses revealed a linear relationship between serum and capillary blood concentrations for all 3 AEDs (r $ 0.95). For LTG, the regression intercept was significantly different from 0, indicating that the relationship was linear, but not necessarily proportional. Although LEV and LCM concentrations tended to be lower in capillary blood than in serum (mean ratio of serum concentration to capillary blood concentration: 1.14 and 1.22, respectively), LTG concentrations were higher in capillary blood (mean ratio = 0.85). Conclusions:The estimation of serum concentrations from measured capillary blood concentrations is feasible for LCM, LTG, and LEV. A simple ratio approach using the mean ratio and Passing-Bablok regression showed the best results for all 3 AEDs. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique facilitates the quantitative sample collection of capillary blood and overcomes the drawbacks associated with the classical dried blood spot technique.

Epilepsy is one of the most common diseases of the central nervous system globally. To ensure the correct dosage of antiepileptic treatment, it is helpful to check the blood levels of the administered substances regularly. The analysis of the capillary dried blood samples provides a promising and less‐invasive alternative to venous blood collection. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop an LC–MS method for the quantification of 22 commonly used drugs in patients with an epileptic syndrome and 5 drug metabolites in one dried blood spot (DBS). The calibration ranges were selected in such a way that the therapeutic reference ranges in serum for the respective substances were completely covered. The analytical validation was successfully performed according to relevant guidelines with a consideration of requirements for DBS analysis. Proof of concept of the developed method was obtained by the analysis of DBSs from 282 authentic leftover ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood samples, which were compared with the corresponding serum concentrations. Altogether, the results show a dependency on the blood/plasma (b/p) ratios of the respective analytes so that for drugs with b/p ratios close to one, for example, lacosamide, levetiracetam, brivaracetam, and sertraline, a good accordance was observed.

Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) approved for the treatment of partial‐onset seizures in adults. As both an inductor and an inhibitor of hepatic enzymes, cenobamate affects the metabolism of other ASMs, among which is clobazam. To our knowledge, the extent of interaction between cenobamate and clobazam and its clinical significance have not been studied yet. In this retrospective study we assessed serum concentrations of clobazam and N‐desmethylclobazam (NCLB)in five patients before and after co‐medication with cenobamate and calculated the percentage increase in concentration‐to‐dose ratio (CDR) of both. We were able to demonstrate that the addition of cenobamate resulted in an increase in serum concentration and consequently in CDR of NCLB in all patients. However this occurred in variable degrees: NCLB concentration showed an increase of 1208 μg/L (CDR145%) in one patient and between 1691 μ/L (CDR 819%) and 3995 μ/L (CDR 1852%) in the other four. This resulted in fatigue, which improved after dose reduction of CLB. Therefore, it is to be concluded that concomitant administration of cenobamate and clobazam can lead to a substantial increase in serum concentrations of NCLB. This can have a positive therapeutic effect on one hand; however, on the other hand, this can lead to unwanted fatigue.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on brivaracetam (BRV) trough serum concentrations. A total number of 368 routinely collected blood samples from 148 inpatients from Mara Hospital (Bethel Epilepsy Center) and von Bodelschwingh Foundation Bethel were retrospectively evaluated. Generalized estimation equations (GEEs) were used for statistical analysis. GEE analyses showed that BRV trough serum concentrations were significantly lower in patients with strong enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, and/or phenobarbital/primidone, −49%), but were not affected by concomitant intake of oxcarbazepine or eslicarbazepine. Age and gender did not have a significant effect. An alternative GEE model analyzing the BRV level-to-dose ratios yielded comparable results. Our results from routine therapeutic drug monitoring data indicate that the effect of enzyme-inducing AEDs on BRV serum concentrations is stronger than the 20%-30% reduction in BRV exposure previously reported in pharmacokinetics studies. Further research is necessary to evaluate these differences and to elucidate possible clinical consequences. K E Y W O R D Santiepileptic drugs, brivaracetam, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring e44 |