No abstract

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINEST he intent of this American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement is to summarize our current understanding of dilated cardiomyopathies. There is special emphasis on recent developments in diagnostic approaches and therapies for specific cardiomyopathies. Recommendations in this document are based on published studies, published practice guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/AHA 1 and other organizations, 2,3 and the multidisciplinary expertise of the writing group. Existing evidence in epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, and management of specific cardiomyopathies is usually derived from nonrandomized observational studies, registries, case reports, or expert opinion based on clinical experience, not large-scale randomized clinical trials or systematic reviews. Therefore, in this document, rather than using the standard ACC/AHA classification schema of recommendations and level of evidence, 4 we have included key management strategies at the end of each section and categorized our recommendations according to the level of consensus. Although the format of our recommendations might resemble the ACC/AHA classification of recommendations used in the ACC/AHA practice guidelines, because of the preponderance of expert opinion or level of evidence C evidence in our document, we elected to use different terminology to provide a distinction from the practice guidelines, in which stronger levels and quality of evidence with randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses are usually present. 4 The levels of evidence follow the AHA and ACC methods of classifying the level of certainty of the treatment effect. 4 DEfINITIoN of DILATED CArDIoMyopAThyThe term dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) refers to a spectrum of heterogeneous myocardial disorders that are characterized by ventricular dilation and depressed myocardial performance in the absence of hypertension, valvular, congenital, or ischemic heart disease. 5 In clinical practice, the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF) has often been placed into 2 categories: ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The term nonischemic cardiomyopathy has been interchangeably used with DCM. Although this approach might be practical, it fails to recognize that nonischemic cardiomyopathy can include cardiomyopathies caused by volume or pressure overload (such as hypertension or valvular heart disease) that are not conventionally accepted under the definition of DCM. 1,5 Again, in general practice and clinical research trials, the term ischemic cardiomyopathy is defined as cardiomyopathy caused by ischemic heart disease. Current use of ischemic cardiomyopathy terminology implies ventricular dilation and depressed myocardial contractility caused by ischemia or infarction. CLASSIfICATIoN of CArDIoMyopAThIESThe first classification on this topic categorized cardiomyopathies as heart muscle diseases with dilated (DCM), hypertrophic, restrictive, arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC), or nonclassifiable cardiomyopathy in 1980. 5 Subse...

BACKGROUND Peripartum cardiomyopathy shares some clinical features with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, a disorder caused by mutations in more than 40 genes, including TTN, which encodes the sarcomere protein titin. METHODS In 172 women with peripartum cardiomyopathy, we sequenced 43 genes with variants that have been associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. We compared the prevalence of different variant types (nonsense, frameshift, and splicing) in these women with the prevalence of such variants in persons with dilated cardiomyopathy and with population controls. RESULTS We identified 26 distinct, rare truncating variants in eight genes among women with peripartum cardiomyopathy. The prevalence of truncating variants (26 in 172 [15%]) was significantly higher than that in a reference population of 60,706 persons (4.7%, P = 1.3×10−7) but was similar to that in a cohort of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (55 of 332 patients [17%], P = 0.81). Two thirds of identified truncating variants were in TTN, as seen in 10% of the patients and in 1.4% of the reference population (P = 2.7×10−10); almost all TTN variants were located in the titin A-band. Seven of the TTN truncating variants were previously reported in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In a clinically well-characterized cohort of 83 women with peripartum cardiomyopathy, the presence of TTN truncating variants was significantly correlated with a lower ejection fraction at 1-year follow-up (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS The distribution of truncating variants in a large series of women with peripartum cardiomyopathy was remarkably similar to that found in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. TTN truncating variants were the most prevalent genetic predisposition in each disorder.

These results suggest that for patients with recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy, IVIG does not augment the improvement in LVEF. However, in this overall cohort, LVEF improved significantly during follow-up, and the short-term prognosis remains favorable.