Background:The Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) is the principal means of assessing motor impairment in Huntington disease but is subjective and generally limited to in-clinic assessments.Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and ability of wearable sensors to measure motor impairment in individuals with Huntington disease in the clinic and at home.Methods: Participants with Huntington disease and controls were asked to wear five accelerometer-based sensors attached to the chest and each limb for standardized, in-clinic assessments and for one day at home. A second chest sensor was worn for six additional days at home. Gait measures were compared between controls, participants with Huntington disease, and participants with Huntington disease grouped by UHDRS total motor score using Cohen's d values.Results: Fifteen individuals with Huntington disease and five controls completed the study. Sensor data were successfully captured from 18 of the 20 participants at home. In the clinic, the standard deviation of step time (time between consecutive steps) was increased in Huntington disease (p<0.0001; Cohen's d=2.61) compared to controls. At home with additional observations, significant differences were observed in seven additional gait measures. The gait of individuals with higher total motor scores (50 or more) differed significantly from those with lower total motor scores (below 50) on multiple measures at home.Conclusions: In this pilot study, the use of wearable sensors in clinic and at home was feasible and demonstrated gait differences between controls, participants with Huntington disease, and participants with Huntington disease grouped by motor impairment.
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms can fluctuate and may not be accurately reflected during a clinical evaluation. In addition, access to movement disorder specialists is limited for many people with PD. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of motion sensor-based telehealth diagnostics on PD clinical care and management. Methods: Eighteen adults with PD were randomized to control or experimental groups. All participants were instructed to use a motion sensor-based monitoring system at home 1 day per week for 7 months. The system included a finger-worn motion sensor and tablet-based software interface that guided patients through tasks to quantify tremor, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia. Data were processed into motor symptom severity reports, which were reviewed by a movement disorder neurologist for the experimental group participants. After 3 months and 6 months, the control group participants visited the clinic for a routine appointment, while the experimental group participants had a videoconference or phone call instead. Results: Home-based assessments were completed with a median compliance of 95.7%. For a subset of participants, the neurologist successfully used information in the reports, such as quantified responses to treatment or progression over time, to make therapy adjustments. Changes in clinical characteristics from study start to end were not significantly different between the groups. Discussion: Individuals with PD were able and willing to use remote monitoring technology. Patient management aided by telehealth diagnostics provided comparable outcomes to standard care. Telehealth technologies combined with wearable sensors have the potential to improve care for disparate PD populations or those unable to travel.
The aim of this study is to develop a smartphone-based high-frequency remote monitoring platform, assess its feasibility for remote monitoring of symptoms in Parkinsons disease, and demonstrate the value of data collected using the platform by detecting dopaminergic medication response.Methods: We have developed HopkinsPD, a novel smartphonebased monitoring platform, which measures symptoms actively (i.e. data are collected when a suite of tests is initiated by the individual at specific times during the day), and passively (i.e. data are collected continuously in the background). After data collection, we extract features to assess measures of five key behaviors related to PD symptoms -voice, balance, gait, dexterity, and reaction time. A random forest classifier is used to discriminate measurements taken after a dose of medication (treatment) versus before the medication dose (baseline).Results: A worldwide study for remote PD monitoring was established using HopkinsPD in July, 2014. This study used entirely remote, online recruitment and installation, demonstrating highly cost-effective scalability. In six months, 226 individuals (121 PD and 105 controls) contributed over 46,000 hours of passive monitoring data and approximately 8,000 instances of structured tests of voice, balance, gait, reaction, and dexterity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to have collected data at such a scale for remote PD monitoring. Moreover, we demonstrate the initial ability to discriminate treatment from baseline with 71.0(±0.4)% accuracy, which suggests medication response can be monitored remotely via smartphone-based measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.