Summary:Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) therapy in controlling partial-onset seizures refractory to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a multicenter study in Taiwanese adults.Methods: Ninety-four patients aged 16-60 years with refractory partial seizures were randomized to receive LEV (n = 47) or placebo (47) for 14 weeks and composed the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. After the first 2 weeks, LEV patients had their dosage increased from 500 mg twice daily to 1,000 mg twice daily. A 12-week maintenance phase followed, after which patients switched to long-term, open-label LEV therapy or entered a 4-week phase of medication discontinuation.Results: All patients from the ITT population, except one LEVtreated patient with missing seizure-count data, were included in the primary efficacy analysis. The least square mean of logarithmically transformed weekly partial-seizure frequency was significantly lower in the LEV than in the placebo group (0.813 vs. 1.085; p = 0.001). LEV reduced log-transformed weekly partial-seizure frequency by 23.8% (95% confidence interval, 10.4-35.2%) relative to placebo. Significantly more LEV than placebo patients (43.5% vs. 10.6%) experienced a response of a ≥50% decrease from baseline in weekly frequency of partial seizures [odds ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 2.2-19.3); p < 0.001]. Adverse events were reported in 34 (72.3%) of 47 LEV-treated patients and 32 (68.1%) of 47 placebo patients. The three most common adverse events in the LEV and placebo groups were somnolence (40.4% and 14.9%), dizziness (14.9% and 8.5%), and headache (10.6% and 8.5%), respectively. Only four patients (three LEVtreated patients and one placebo patient) were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events.Conclusions: Adjunctive LEV therapy, ≤1,000 mg twice daily, was significantly more effective than placebo and was generally well tolerated in Taiwanese adults with treatmentresistant partial-onset seizures.
Summary: Purpose: To investigate antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal during video‐EEG monitoring in adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: Between 1995 and 1997, 102 consecutive patients with refractory TLE were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit for presurgical evaluation. Patients were monitored with ongoing AEDs being rapidly decreased and discontinued in 4–6 days. The monitoring was continued until sufficient numbers of seizures were recorded. Serum AED levels were checked at admission and after the first complex partial seizure (CPS). Results: In all, 89 patients had 429 CPSs (mean, 4.8 per patient), including 156 (36.4%) secondarily generalized. A mean of 153.8 h (16–451 h) was required for completing the monitoring in each patient. Forty‐three (48.3%) patients experienced seizure clusters, and eight (9.0%) had generalized seizures that had never occurred or had been absent for years. However, none evolved to status epilepticus. Carbamazepine was the most commonly used AED in 71.9% of patients, followed by valproate and phenytoin. When the first CPS occurred, mean 77.2 h since the beginning of the monitoring, serum levels of these three AEDs were mostly subtherapeutic rather than minimal. Conclusions: Acute AED withdrawal effectively provoked seizures in TLE patients undergoing presurgical video‐EEG monitoring. However, nearly 50% of patients had seizure clusters or secondarily generalized seizures. Serum AED levels were mostly subtherapeutic when the first CPS occurred.
Summary: Purpose:The efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult Chinese patients with refractory partial epilepsy were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Methods: A total of 46 patients who had four or more complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization within an 8-week baseline phase were enrolled. Patients were assigned randomly to receive TPM (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23). TPM or placebo was titrated to target doses of 300 mg/d for 6 weeks and maintained at stabilized levels for another 8 weeks. Concomitant antiepileptic drugs remained at constant previous levels during the trial.Results: In all, 41 patients completed the trial (TPM group, n = 20; placebo group, n = 21). The proportion of patients with a 250% reduction from baseline in complex partial seizures was 11 of 23 (47.8%) in the TPM group and 3 of 23 (13.0%) in the placebo group (p = 0.01). In addition, patients treated with TPM had significantly better investigator (p = 0.014) and patient (p = 0.0005) global assessment scores than patients in the placebo group. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Two patients with TPM therapy complained of weight loss. Routine blood cell counts and other laboratory results showed no significant changes from baseline in either treatment group. Conclusions: TPM 300 mgld is effective and well tolerated as treatment for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.
SUMMARYObjective: This study aimed to explore the effects of theory of mind (ToM) and related potential risk factors, including cognitive functions, psychiatric status, and seizure-related clinical variables, on social functioning in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: Sixty-seven patients with intractable TLE who were potential candidates for epilepsy surgery and 30 matched controls were included. All participants completed four tasks measuring different levels of ToM (False Belief, Faux Pas Recognition, Implication Stories, and Visual Cartoon), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale for Epilepsy (SOFSE), and neuropsychological tests. Results: The patients exhibited impairments in both basic and advanced ToM. Multiple regression analyses revealed the following: (1) the SOFSE total score was significantly predicted by the Faux Pas Recognition (FPR), Global Severity Index (GSI) score of the SCL-90-R, and Full-Scale intelligence quotient (IQ) of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), which accounted for 38%, 11%, and 8% of the variance, respectively; and (2) the FPR was a significant predictor of all SOFSE subscales, whereas the GSI score contributed substantially to the Interpersonal Relationships, Communication, and Occupation subscales of the SOFSE. Significance: Advanced ToM, measured by impaired faux pas recognition, is a relatively strong predictor of poor social functioning in surgical candidates for intractable TLE. Identifying ToM impairment may help plan nonpharmacologic treatment for improving social functions in patients with intractable TLE.
Summary:Purpose: To investigate antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal during video-EEG monitoring in adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).Methods: Between 1995 and 1997, 102 consecutive patients with refractory TLE were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit for presurgical evaluation. Patients were monitored with ongoing AEDs being rapidly decreased and discontinued in 4-6 days. The monitoring was continued until sufficient numbers of seizures were recorded. Serum AED levels were checked at admission and after the first complex partial seizure (CPS).Results: In all, 89 patients had 429 CPSs (mean, 4.8 per patient), including 156 (36.4%) secondarily generalized. A mean of 153.8 h (16-451 h) was required for completing the monitoring in each patient. Forty-three (48.3%) patients experienced seizure clusters, and eight (9.0%) had generalized seizures that had never occurred or had been absent for years. However, none evolved to status epilepticus. Carbamazepine was the most commonly used AED in 71.9% of patients, followed by valproate and phenytoin. When the first CPS occurred, mean 77.2 h since the beginning of the monitoring, serum levels of these three AEDs were mostly subtherapeutic rather than minimal.Conclusions: Acute AED withdrawal effectively provoked seizures in TLE patients undergoing presurgical video-EEG monitoring. However, nearly 50% of patients had seizure clusters or secondarily generalized seizures. Serum AED levels were mostly subtherapeutic when the first CPS occurred.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.