BACKGROUNDResults of an earlier analysis of a trial of the M72/AS01 E candidate vaccine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis showed that in infected adults, the vaccine provided 54.0% protection against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, without evident safety concerns. We now report the results of the 3-year final analysis of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. METHODSFrom August 2014 through November 2015, we enrolled adults 18 to 50 years of age with M. tuberculosis infection (defined by positive results on interferon-γ release assay) without evidence of active tuberculosis disease at centers in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of either M72/AS01 E or placebo, administered 1 month apart. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of M72/AS01 E to prevent active pulmonary tuberculosis disease according to the first case definition (bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis not associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection). Participants were followed for 3 years after the second dose. Participants with clinical suspicion of tuberculosis provided sputum samples for polymerase-chain-reaction assay, mycobacterial culture, or both. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were evaluated until month 36 in a subgroup of 300 participants. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of M72/AS01 E or placebo. RESULTSA total of 3575 participants underwent randomization, of whom 3573 received at least one dose of M72/AS01 E or placebo, and 3330 received both planned doses. Among the 3289 participants in the according-to-protocol efficacy cohort, 13 of the 1626 participants in the M72/AS01 E group, as compared with 26 of the 1663 participants in the placebo group, had cases of tuberculosis that met the first case definition (incidence, 0.3 vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years). The vaccine efficacy at month 36 was 49.7% (90% confidence interval [CI], 12.1 to 71.2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 74.2). Among participants in the M72/AS01 E group, the concentrations of M72-specific antibodies and the frequencies of M72-specific CD4+ T cells increased after the first dose and were sustained throughout the follow-up period. Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups. CONCLUSIONSAmong adults infected with M. tuberculosis, vaccination with M72/AS01 E elicited an immune response and provided protection against progression to pulmonary tuberculosis disease for at least 3 years. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Aeras; Clini-calTrials.gov number, NCT01755598.
Once-daily suppressive therapy with valacyclovir significantly reduces the risk of transmission of genital herpes among heterosexual, HSV-2-discordant couples.
Background:A tuberculosis vaccine to interrupt transmission is urgently needed. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine, M72/AS01E, against progression to bacteriologically-confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis disease in adults with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. Methods:In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial conducted in Kenya, South Africa and Zambia, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative adults aged 18-50 years with latent Mtb infection (positive by interferon-gamma release assay) were randomized (1:1) to receive two doses of either M72/AS01E or placebo intramuscularly on days 0 and 30. Clinical suspicion of tuberculosis was confirmed from sputum using a polymerase chain reaction test and/or mycobacterial culture. Results:This paper reports the primary analysis, conducted after a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. 1786 participants received M72/AS01E and 1787 received placebo. In the vaccine group, 10 cases met the primary case definition (bacteriologically-confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed prior to treatment, not associated with HIV infection) versus 22 cases in the placebo group (0.3 vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years, respectively): vaccine efficacy 54.0% (90% confidence interval 13.9-75.4; 95%CI 2.9-78.2; p=0.04). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events within 7 days post-injection were more frequent among M72/AS01E recipients (91.2%) than placebo recipients (68.9%), the difference attributed mainly to injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms. Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases and deaths occurred with similar low frequencies between groups. Conclusions:M72/AS01E was associated with a clinically acceptable safety profile and provided 54.0% protection for Mtb-infected adults against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease.
Objective. To assess the phospholipid specificity and immunoglobulin isotype of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies in patients with acute parvovirus B19 infection.Methods. Specificity of aPL and isotype distribution in the negatively charged phospholipids, cardiolipin and phosphatidyl serine, and in the neutral phospholipid, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, were measured in the sera of patients with acute parvovirus B19 infections (n = 12), in those with other acute viral infections (n = lo), and in those with syphilis (n = 15) by enzymelinked immunosorbent assays. The dependence of anticardiolipin (aCL) binding on the presence of p2-glycoprotein I (p2-GPI) as a binding cofactor was assessed in these same groups, and was compared with sera from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (n = 11) with raised aCL antibody reactivity.Results. Antibodies against any of the 3 phospholipids were found in all 3 groups of patients with infections (B19 in 11 of 12 patients, other viral infections in 8 of 10 patients, and syphilis in 14 of 15 patients). B19 patients' sera contained predominantly IgG antibodies against the negatively charged phospholipids, cardiolipin and phosphatidyl serine, and differed in their specificity and isotype distribution from those found in the other 2 patient groups. B19-associated aCL increased their binding to antigen in the presence of &GPI as a binding cofactor, similar to aCL found in Conclusion. The results show the remarkable similarity in specificity of aPL antibodies between B19-infected patients and SLE patients, and raise the question of whether parvovirus infection may be a trigger for the development of aPL antibodies in autoimmune diseases.Human infection with parvovirus B19, a small, single-stranded DNA virus, is associated with a variety of clinical manifestations, including rash, arthralgia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, fetal wastage, hypocomplementemia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and vasculitis (1-3). In addition, infection can be associated with elevated levels of autoantibodies to nuclear components (antinuclear antibodies [ANA]), doublestranded DNA (dsDNA), lymphocyte antigens, neutrophi1 cytoplasmic antigens, and cardiolipin (1-4).The prevalence and specificities of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) in B19 infection are not known. Raised levels of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) or aCL have been reported in a variety of other infections, including chicken pox, hepatitis A, infectious mononucleosis, rubella, adenovirus, mumps, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (5), and are also well recognized in syphilitic infections (6). In light of the similarity of some of the clinical features presented by parvovirus B19 infection with those of autoimmune connective tissue diseases, we were interested in determining if the aCL antibodies observed in B19 infection were similar to those found in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and whether similar antibodies were found in patients with acute viral infections other than parvovirus B19. One distinguishing feature of aCL found in au...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.