A nomenclature is described for restriction endonucleases, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and related genes and gene products. It provides explicit categories for the many different Type II enzymes now identified and provides a system for naming the putative genes found by sequence analysis of microbial genomes.

The known nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes are hetero-oligomeric proteins that behave as molecular machines in response to their target sequences. They translocate DNA in a process dependent on the hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate. For the ATP-dependent type I and type III restriction and modification systems, the collision of translocating complexes triggers hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds in unmodified DNA to generate double-strand breaks. Type I endonucleases break the DNA at unspecified sequences remote from the target sequence, type III endonucleases at a fixed position close to the target sequence. Type I and type III restriction and modification (R-M) systems are notable for effective post-translational control of their endonuclease activity. For some type I enzymes, this control is mediated by proteolytic degradation of that subunit of the complex which is essential for DNA translocation and breakage. This control, lacking in the well-studied type II R-M systems, provides extraordinarily effective protection of resident DNA should it acquire unmodified target sequences. The only well-documented GTP-dependent restriction enzyme, McrBC, requires methylated target sequences for the initiation of phosphodiester bond cleavage.

Restriction endonucleases interact with DNA at specific sites leading to cleavage of DNA. Bacterial DNA is protected from restriction endonuclease cleavage by modifying the DNA using a DNA methyltransferase. Based on their molecular structure, sequence recognition, cleavage position and cofactor requirements, restriction–modification (R–M) systems are classified into four groups. Type III R–M enzymes need to interact with two separate unmethylated DNA sequences in inversely repeated head-to-head orientations for efficient cleavage to occur at a defined location (25–27 bp downstream of one of the recognition sites). Like the Type I R–M enzymes, Type III R–M enzymes possess a sequence-specific ATPase activity for DNA cleavage. ATP hydrolysis is required for the long-distance communication between the sites before cleavage. Different models, based on 1D diffusion and/or 3D-DNA looping, exist to explain how the long-distance interaction between the two recognition sites takes place. Type III R–M systems are found in most sequenced bacteria. Genome sequencing of many pathogenic bacteria also shows the presence of a number of phase-variable Type III R–M systems, which play a role in virulence. A growing number of these enzymes are being subjected to biochemical and genetic studies, which, when combined with ongoing structural analyses, promise to provide details for mechanisms of DNA recognition and catalysis.

Many DNA-modifying enzymes act in a manner that requires communication between two noncontiguous DNA sites. These sites can be brought into contact either by a diffusion-mediated chance interaction between enzymes bound at the two sites, or by active translocation of the intervening DNA by a site-bound enzyme. EcoP15I, a type III restriction enzyme, needs to interact with two recognition sites separated by up to 3,500 bp before it can cleave DNA. Here, we have studied the behavior of EcoP15I, using a novel fast-scan atomic force microscope, which uses a miniaturized cantilever and scan stage to reduce the mechanical response time of the cantilever and to prevent the onset of resonant motion at high scan speeds. With this instrument, we were able to achieve scan rates of up to 10 frames per s under fluid. The improved time resolution allowed us to image EcoP15I in real time at scan rates of 1-3 frames per s. EcoP15I translocated DNA in an ATP-dependent manner, at a rate of 79 ؎ 33 bp/s. The accumulation of supercoiling, as a consequence of movement of EcoP15I along the DNA, could also be observed. EcoP15I bound to its recognition site was also seen to make nonspecific contacts with other DNA sites, thus forming DNA loops and reducing the distance between the two recognition sites. On the basis of our results, we conclude that EcoP15I uses two distinct mechanisms to communicate between two recognition sites: diffusive DNA loop formation and ATPasedriven translocation of the intervening DNA contour.imaging ͉ nucleic acid ͉ restriction-modification enzyme ͉ scanning-probe