Recent studies have demonstrated a role for Staphylococcus aureus cidA-mediated cell lysis and genomic DNA release in biofilm adherence. The current study extends these findings by examining both temporal and additional genetic factors involved in the control of genomic DNA release and degradation during biofilm maturation. Cell lysis and DNA release were found to be critical for biofilm attachment during the initial stages of development and the released DNA (eDNA) remained an important matrix component during biofilm maturation. This study also revealed that an lrgAB mutant exhibits increased biofilm adherence and matrix-associated eDNA consistent with its proposed role as an inhibitor of cidA-mediated lysis. In flow-cell assays, both cid and lrg mutations had dramatic effects on biofilm maturation and tower formation. Finally, staphylococcal thermonuclease was shown to be involved in biofilm development as a nuc mutant formed a thicker biofilm containing increased levels of matrix-associated eDNA. Together, these findings suggest a model in which the opposing activities of the cid and lrg gene products control cell lysis and genomic DNA release during biofilm development, while staphylococcal thermonuclease functions to degrade the eDNA, possibly as a means to promote biofilm dispersal.
The Staphylococcus aureus cid and lrg operons are known to be involved in biofilm formation by controlling cell lysis and the release of genomic DNA, which ultimately becomes a structural component of the biofilm matrix. Although the molecular mechanisms controlling cell death and lysis are unknown, it has been hypothesized that the cidA and lrgA genes encode holin-and antiholin-like proteins and function to regulate these processes similarly to bacteriophage-induced death and lysis. In this study, we focused on the biochemical and molecular characterization of CidA and LrgA with the goal of testing the holin model. First, membrane fractionation and fluorescent protein fusion studies revealed that CidA and LrgA are membrane-associated proteins. Furthermore, similarly to holins, CidA and LrgA were found to oligomerize into high-molecular-mass complexes whose formation was dependent on disulfide bonds formed between cysteine residues. To determine the function of disulfide bond-dependent oligomerization of CidA, an S. aureus mutant in which the wild-type copy of the cidA gene was replaced with the cysteine mutant allele was generated. As determined by -galactosidase release assays, this mutant exhibited increased cell lysis during stationary phase, suggesting that oligomerization has a negative impact on this process. When analyzed for biofilm development and maturation, this mutant displayed increased biofilm adhesion in a static assay and a greater amount of dead-cell accumulation during biofilm maturation. These studies support the model that CidA and LrgA proteins are bacterial holin-/antiholin-like proteins that function to control cell death and lysis during biofilm development.
Interactions with immune responses or exposure to certain antibiotics can remove the peptidoglycan wall of many Gram-negative bacteria. Though the spheroplasts thus created usually lyse, some may survive by resynthesizing their walls and shapes. Normally, bacterial morphology is generated by synthetic complexes directed by FtsZ and MreBCD or their homologues, but whether these classic systems can recreate morphology in the absence of a preexisting template is unknown. To address this question, we treated Escherichia coli with lysozyme to remove the peptidoglycan wall while leaving intact the inner and outer membranes and periplasm. The resulting lysozyme-induced (LI) spheroplasts recovered a rod shape after four to six generations. Recovery proceeded via a series of cell divisions that produced misshapen and branched intermediates before later progeny assumed a normal rod shape. Importantly, mutants defective in mounting the Rcs stress response and those lacking penicillin binding protein 1B (PBP1B) or LpoB could not divide or recover their cell shape but instead enlarged until they lysed. LI spheroplasts from mutants lacking the Lpp lipoprotein or PBP6 produced spherical daughter cells that did not recover a normal rod shape or that did so only after a significant delay. Thus, to regenerate normal morphology de novo, E. coli must supplement the classic FtsZ-and MreBCD-directed cell wall systems with activities that are otherwise dispensable for growth under normal laboratory conditions. The existence of these auxiliary mechanisms implies that they may be required for survival in natural environments, where bacterial walls can be damaged extensively or removed altogether.
Peptidoglycan is a vital component of nearly all cell wall-bearing bacteria and is a valuable target for antibacterial therapy. However, despite decades of work, there remain important gaps in understanding how this macromolecule is synthesized and molded into a three-dimensional structure that imparts specific morphologies to individual cells. Here, we investigated the particularly enigmatic area of how peptidoglycan is synthesized and shaped during the first stages of creating cell shape , that is, in the absence of a preexisting template. We found that when lysozyme-induced (LI) spheroplasts of were allowed to resynthesize peptidoglycan, the cells divided first and then elongated to recreate a normal rod-shaped morphology. Penicillin binding protein 1B (PBP1B) was critical for the first stage of this recovery process. PBP1B synthesized peptidoglycan , and this synthesis required that PBP1B interact with the outer membrane lipoprotein LpoB. Surprisingly, when LpoB was localized improperly to the inner membrane, recovering spheroplasts synthesized peptidoglycan and divided but then propagated as amorphous spheroidal cells, suggesting that the regeneration of a normal rod shape depends on a particular spatial interaction. Similarly, spheroplasts carrying a PBP1B variant lacking transpeptidase activity or those in which PBP1A was overproduced could synthesize new peptidoglycan and divide but then grew as oddly shaped spheroids. We conclude that cell wall synthesis requires the glycosyltransferase activity of PBP1B but that PBP1B transpeptidase activity is needed to assemble cell walls with wild-type morphology. Bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan is synthesized and modified by penicillin binding proteins (PBPs), which are targeted by about half of all currently prescribed antibiotics, including penicillin and its derivatives. Because antibiotic resistance is rising, it has become increasingly urgent that we fill the gaps in our knowledge about how PBPs create and assemble this protective wall. We report here that PBP1B plays an essential role in synthesizing peptidoglycan in the absence of a preexisting template: its glycosyltransferase activity is responsible for synthesis, while its transpeptidase activity is required to construct cell walls of a specific shape. These results highlight the importance of this enzyme and distinguish its biological roles from those of other PBPs and peptidoglycan synthases.
After losing their protective peptidoglycan, bacterial spheroplasts can resynthesize a cell wall to recreate their normal shape. In Escherichia coli, this process requires the Rcs response. In its absence, spheroplasts do not revert to rod shapes but instead form enlarged spheroids and lyse. Here, we investigated the reason for this Rcs requirement. Rcs-deficient spheroids exhibited breaks and bulges in their periplasmic spaces and failed to synthesize a complete peptidoglycan cell wall, indicating that the bacterial envelope was defective. To determine the Rcs-dependent gene(s) required for shape recovery, we tested spheroplasts lacking selected RcsB-regulated genes and found that colanic acid (CA) biosynthesis appeared to be involved. Surprisingly, though, extracellular CA was not required for recovery. Instead, lysis was caused by mutations that interrupted CA biosynthesis downstream of the initial glycosyl transferase, WcaJ. Deleting wcaJ prevented lysis of spheroplasts lacking ensuing steps in the pathway, and providing WcaJ in trans to a mutant lacking the entire CA operon triggered spheroplast enlargement and lysis. Thus, CA is not required for spheroplast recovery. Instead, CA intermediates accumulate as dead-end products which inhibit recovery of wallless cells. The results strongly imply that CA may not be required for the survival E. coli L-forms. More broadly, these findings mandate that previous conclusions about the role of colanic acid in biofilm formation or virulence must be reevaluated. IMPORTANCEWall-less bacteria can resynthesize their walls and recreate a normal shape, which in Escherichia coli requires the Rcs response. While attempting to identify the Rcs-dependent gene required for shape recovery, we found that colanic acid (CA) biosynthesis appeared to be involved. Surprisingly, though, cell death was caused by mutations that interrupted CA biosynthesis downstream of the initial step in the pathway, creating dead-end compounds that inhibited recovery of wall-less cells. When testing for the biological role of CA, most previous experiments used mutants that would accumulate these deadly intermediates, meaning that all prior conclusions must be reexamined to determine if the results were caused by these lethal side effects instead of accurately reflecting the biological purpose of CA itself. Bacterial cell shape is determined by coordinated and dynamic interactions among cytoskeletal elements, peptidoglycan synthesis, and cell division (as reviewed in references 1 and 2), and the wall and some of its morphological characteristics contribute to cell survival in suboptimal or hostile environments (3). For example, the host immune system elaborates several antibacterial factors, including lysozyme, cationic antimicrobial peptides, and protein complexes, which target the cell envelope and trigger bacterial lysis (4-6). In particular, lysozyme removes the peptidoglycan wall and leads to cell rupture. However, such cells may not lyse if they are immersed in an osmotically protective medi...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.