Measuring tooth widths is a key component of orthodontic treatment planning. Over recent decades, many methods have been proposed to achieve this purpose. The current review highlights and describes the initial techniques. The evidence behind their use is presented along with a brief discussion of their benefits and shortfalls. With knowledge and understanding of the accuracy and limitations of the various measurement methods, the clinician may be better informed and therefore able to select the most appropriate method for clinical practice.
Aims: (1) To determine the variability of S-N and Frankfort planes, (2) to establish the reproducibility of natural head position, (3) to establish norms for five cephalometric parameters in natural head position.
Materials and methods:A sample of 31 young adults from dental student population was selected under certain criteria. Two lateral cephalograms in natural head position (NHP) for each subject were taken within a span of 5 to 10 minutes following standardized procedure. All cephalograms were developed and traced by the same clinician under standard conditions. A true horizontal line drawn on film was transferred to tracing paper.The conventional cephalometric planes were drawn. Subsequently, five angles were measured between true horizontal (HOR) and these conventional cephalometric planes.
Results:The above observations were subjected to statistical analysis to establish the variability of conventional intracranial reference planes and consistency of NHP. Statistical norms for five cephalometric parameters with respect to NHP were also established.
Conclusion:Since there is considerable variation in the inclination of conventional S-N and FH planes, a true horizontal extracranial reference line in NHP should substitute, or at least supplement, the use of intracranial reference planes for efficient orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The new norms established for the five cephalometric parameters provide data that more closely describes morphology as it appears in real life. Hence, this data is more meaningful in clinical practice.
Digital models and intra-oral scanners are gaining increasing popularity in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning by allowing clinicians to store and ‘virtually’ analyse dental casts. The present paper reviews the various digital model programs and available intra-oral scanners and presents the research which has tested their accuracy. With this information, clinicians may be better informed to adopt the most appropriate system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.