Introduction: Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is the most common complication of dural puncture. Clinical studies have shown that use of small guage needles with pencil point tip is associated with lower incidence and severity of PDPH than with cutting tip needles. Aim: To compare the incidence and severity of PDPH between 25G cutting (Quincke) and 25G non cutting (Whitacre) needles. Materials and Methods: In this randomised controlled study conducted at Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical SciencesImphal, Manipur, India from September 2019 to September 2021. A total of 150 patients of both sexes, age <60 years and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II, undergoing lower abdominal or lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled for this study and divided into two groups with 75 patients in each group. Spinal anaesthesia was performed with 25G Quincke needle in one group and 25G Whitacre needle used in other group to compare the incidence and severity of PDPH (severity was determined by limitation of patient activity and treatment required). Results: Overall 14 patients (9.33%) developed PDPH – 2 in the Whitacre spinal needle (2.6%), and 12 in the Quincke spinal needle (16%), with p-value of 0.009. The incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia was significantly higher with Whitacre spinal needle 12 (16%) than with Quincke needle 4 (5.3%), with p-value of 0.03. Incidence of PDPH was more in female patients 12 (14.8%) compared with male patients 2 (2.9%),with p-value of 0.018. Severity of PDPH ranged from mild (n=10) to moderate (n=2) in Quincke needle group, whereas in Whitacre group patients had only mild form of PDPH (n=2). Conclusion: Incidence and severity of PDPH was significantly lower in 25G Whitacre spinal needle than 25G Quincke needle. Failure rate of spinal anaesthesia was more in Whitacre needle than in Quincke needle.
Introduction: General anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation, being one of the most commonly performed procedures in clinical anaesthesiology, is not without adverse effects. Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) is one of the common adverse effects with a varying incidence. Prophylactic management of POST is recommended to improve the quality of postanaesthesia care and recovery. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative nebulisation with magnesium sulphate and budesonide in reducing the incidence and severity of POST. Materials and Methods: This randomised double-blinded control study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India, from September 2021 to December 2021. The study included 120 patients, of either sex, aged between 20-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II posted for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of 40 patients each. Group M was nebulised with 250 mg magnesium sulphate, Group B with 250 mcg budesonide and Group S was nebulised with normal saline, 15 minutes prior to the induction of anaesthesia. Incidence and severity of POST was documented at 0 hr, 2 hrs, 24 hrs and 48 hrs postextubation on a 0-3 score. Data collected was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 and the results were then statistically analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square test. Results: The incidence of POST was more in saline group when compared with budesonide and magnesium sulphate group at all points of observation (0 hr, 2 hrs, 24 hrs and 48 hrs). The severity of POST was moderate in saline group while the other two groups experienced mild severity. This was statistically significant at 0 hr, 2 hrs and 24 hrs (p-value <0.05). But at 48 hrs severity of POST among the three groups was not significant. Conclusion: Preoperative nebulisation with magnesium sulphate and budesonide significantly reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.