Background. Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has improved organ preservation and viability assessment among heart, liver, and lung transplantation. However, literature regarding the application of NMP in human clinical kidney transplantation remains limited. Numerous kidneys, especially from donors with stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), are not utilized concerning the high rate of delayed graft function (DGF) and primary nonfunction. The present study investigated the impact of NMP (135–150 min) on short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from deceased donors with AKI. Methods. Graft outcomes of NMP kidneys were compared with contralateral kidneys stored in static cold storage (SCS) from the same donor with AKI during December 2019–June 2021. The study’s primary aim is to assess the safety and feasibility of NMP in deceased donors with AKI. The primary outcome was DGF. Secondary outcomes were duration of DGF, biopsy-proven rejection, postoperative intrarenal resistive index, postoperative infections, hospital stay duration, primary nonfunction, and kidney function estimated glomerular filtrate rate at discharge, 3 mo, and 1 y. Results. Five pairs of AKI kidneys (NMP versus SCS) were included in the final analysis. The results show no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between NMP versus SCS kidneys; however, NMP kidneys demonstrated slightly improved estimated glomerular filtrate rate at 3 mo (59.8 ± 5.93 [59] versus 75.20 ± 14.94 [74]) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.065) and at the last follow-up (12–29 mo) (72.80 ± 10.71 [75]) versus (94 ± 22.67 [82]) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.059) as compared with SCS kidneys. A higher proportion of NMP kidneys had normal intrarenal resistive index (0.5–0.7) and mild acute tubular injury on protocol biopsy, suggesting NMP is safe and feasible in deceased donors with acute kidney injury. Conclusions. NMPs of AKI donor kidneys are safe and feasible. A larger cohort is required to explore the reconditioning effect of NMP on AKI kidneys.

Background COVID-19 infection is considered to cause high mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Old age, comorbidities and acute kidney injury are known risk factors for increased mortality in KTR. Nevertheless, mortality rates have varied across different regions. Differences in age, comorbidities and varying standards of care across geographies may explain some variations. However, it is still unclear whether post-transplant duration, induction therapy, antirejection therapy and co-infections contribute to increased mortality in KTR with COVID-19. The present study assessed risk factors in a large cohort from India. Methods A matched case–control study was performed to analyze risk factors for death in KTR (N = 218) diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 2020 to July 2021 at the study centre. Cases were KTR who died (non-survivors, N = 30), whereas those who survived were taken as controls (survivors, N = 188). Results A high death-to-case ratio of 13.8% was observed amongst study group KTR infected with COVID-19. There was a high incidence (12.4%) of co-infections, with cytomegalovirus being the most common co-infection among non-survivors. Diarrhea, co-infection, high oxygen requirement, and need for mechanical ventilation were significantly associated with mortality on regression analyses. Antirejection therapy, lymphopenia and requirement for renal replacement therapy were associated with worse outcomes. Conclusions The mortality was much higher in KTR who required mechanical ventilation and had co-infections. Mortality did not vary with the type of transplant, post-transplant duration and usage of depletion induction therapy. An aggressive approach has to be taken for an early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of associated infections.

The determination of Brain Death (BD)/Death by neurological criteria (DNC) is now widely accepted among various international societies following the World Brain Death project recommendation. As per the World Brain Death project, ancillary testing should be performed when standard brain-death examination components are inconclusive or cannot be performed. BD was defined legally in 1994 under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act (THOA). However, even after 27 years of the formulated law, there are no guidelines in the THOA regarding the determination of BD using ancillary tests. The present brief report describes two instances where ancillary tests like four-vessel angiography and transcranial doppler-aided brain-death certification were done. It is the first available literature from our country where ancillary tests aided in confirmation of BD when the standard clinical components of DNC could not be performed.

No abstract

Conclusion: EVNMP can help decision making in complex situations where graft viability assessment is not readily apparent.