An overview of the experiences with deployment of undergraduate medical students in a Dutch university center during the COVID-19 pandemic is provided from organisational and educational perspectives. Medical students' and specialists' experiences during the first peak of COVID-19 underscore the preliminary suggestion that students can be given more enhanced (yet supervised) responsibility for patient care early in their practicums.

In many emergency departments (EDs), young, inexperienced doctors treat patients who are critically ill. At the start of their career, these novice doctors are not sufficiently qualified to take care of these potentially critically ill patients in the highly demanding environment of an ED. This not only poses a threat to the wellbeing of the doctor, who feels inadequately prepared and experiences a lot of stress, but also to that of the patients, who may not receive optimal care. Lastly, young doctors may influence the efficiency of the organization, with longer throughput times, more orders of ancillary investigations, and more admissions.Training novice doctors with regard to simple or complex skills using simulation techniques is part of the solution. However, the transfer of newly learned skills to clinical practice remains unexplored, and not everything can be trained before the actual skill is required. Therefore, it is important to train young doctors in their learning abilities, for instance, teach them how to be adaptive and how to use their skills in new situations. Lastly, the way care is organized is essential. Good supervision, leaving room for the learning processes of young doctors, developing a team with more experienced professionals (paramedics, nurses, and doctors), and well-organized processes, aiming to reduce the complexity of the work, are ways to improve the quality of care, independent of the experience level of the novice doctor.

This study shows a high interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of CTS based on patient history alone. Neurological examination rarely changed this diagnosis, suggesting a prominent role for the case history and a limited role for neurological examination. This may have practical implications.