The issues in this study include:1) Is the implementation of market economic system run properly and 2) What contribution does law give in market economic and what concept of a pro-market Law Development should be. Conducted by using the judicial-normative method and specified by an analytical-descriptive approach, this research is aimed to obtain the secondary data through a library research for the substances relevant to legal materials on the theories about laws and economics, which at this point is by using a qualitative analysis. The research then concludes that the system of market economy refers to the one giving freedom to individual to achieve as high profit as possible in the economic aspect. There is no role of government as all economic system is given to the individual as the subject of economy. Nevertheless, the market economy is not able to be fully conducted without involving the government that in this case acts to regulate the law. Without this, a downturn of market economy will occur. The system of market economy without any legal support, particularly economic law, will never properly run to achieving the welfare and prosperity.

Ambidexterity plays an important role in organizational development, which influences national development. National development is a joint effort between the people and the state which is carried out in order to improve themselves in a better direction together. The aim of this research is to analyze the law of organizational amidecsterity development in higher education institutions. This research is part of a qualitative research using a systematic review approach. Systematic review is a method that uses previous evidence-based evidence through review, evaluation, structured evaluation, classification and categorization. The results of the research analysis show that the ambidexterity of higher education institutions is a model that integrates the performance determinants of classy higher education institutions, and proposes a commitment that is influenced by: (a) brand ambidexterity, which is explorative and exploitative oriented; (b) able to adapt to the social and economic environment; and (c) being responsive to students' perceptions of the university's brand image and reputation which will increase their commitment to their studies. The implication of this research is to provide an overview to higher education institutions so they can develop the concept of ambidexterity in the process of implementing higher education.

Arbitration is a means of resolving business disputes that is most similar to a court body and is considered to have many advantages over other alternative dispute resolutions. Pacta Sunt Servanda is one of the main principles of Arbitration, which states that the settlement produced in a settlement is binding on the parties, like a law must be faithfully executed. Arbitration must be respected and followed by the parties in addition to their obligation to resolve conflicts through mediation. Pursuant under Article 3 of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Act No. 30 of 1999, if parties to a commercial dispute have engaged in an arbitration settlement, The District Court isn't entitled to make your mind up among the parties. A normative approach to legal principles is used in this work. This research is descriptive-analytical, and it collects secondary data from legal materials such as laws and regulations, literature, and legal documents relevant to arbitration law utilizing a document study data gathering tool, contract law and legal certainty theory, where the research results will be analyzed qualitatively.

Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia, under the applicable law (Law 40/2007 and PP 47/2021), are under the obligation to realize its corporate social responsibility. The idea of CSR is to force the company to make it presence felt beneficially by the local community and wider society.  Unfortunately, not all companies are willing and able to meet its corporate social responsibility, or even if they chose to do so, proportionality is disregard. This paper, using Rudolph von Jhering's point of view, explores and identifies what legal or non-legal factors hinders the implementation of CSR.

The use of standard agreements or standard clauses in economic activities in offering goods or services produced by business actors is a necessity and demand. This is also the case in the operational activities of banks in carrying out their business activities as intermediaries for both depositor and debtor customers. In practice, the use and application of new agreements in the banking world is not without problems. Standard agreements that are applied to customers, especially depositor customers, contain many injustices for depositors that violate the principle of balance. Including violations of a number of provisions stipulated in Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law, including the presence of an ecosenary clause or exclusion clause, writing or letters that are small so that it is difficult to read or understand their meaning.