Science-policy interactions, interfaces and engagement in the context of climate change 1.2 Climate change, agriculture and food security 1.3 Science-policy engagement to accelerate a transformation in food systems: main challenges and knowledge gaps 1.4 Research aim, questions and relevance 1.4.1 Research aim and questions 1.4.2 Societal relevance 1.5 Research design, selected case study and methods 1.5.1 Case study 1.5.2 Data collection and methods 1.5.3 Data analysis 1.5.4 Research ethics and positionality 1.6 Outline of the dissertation 2.1 2.4.1 Navigate towards specific points of leverage 2.4.2 Allocate resources in three thirds 2.4.3 Join in external processes 2.4.4 Use research products to build scientific credibility 2.4.5 Sustain co-learning throughout policy engagement and implementation 2.4.6 Tackle power and influence 2.4.7 Invest in, and monitor, capacity enhancement 2.4.8 Mainstream higher-level goals 2.4.9 Create mechanisms for internal learning 2.4.10 Communicate strategically and actively 2.4.11 Explanatory factors for successful science-policy engagement 2.4.12 Challenges in science-policy engagement efforts 2.4.13 Quantitative analysis and contextualisation of principles 2.5 Discussion 2.5.1 Engagement 2.5.2 Evidence 2.5.3 Outreach 2.6 A revised and improved programme theory 2.7 Conclusion 3.1 3.4.5 Adverse power dynamics 3.4.6 Lack of institutional capacity 3.4.7 Inductively derived fail factors in science-policy engagement 3.4.8 Fail factors contextualised in examples 3.5 Discussion 3.5.1 Credibility, salience and legitimacy 3.5.2 Institutional arrangements and capacity 3.5.3 Navigating power dynamics 3.5.4 Funding uncertainties 3.6 Failing intelligently at the interface between science and policy 3.7 Conclusions 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Conceptual approach and methods 4.2.1 Conceptual approach: institutional analysis for AR4D 4.3 Methods 4.4 Results 4.4.1 Accountability 4.4.2 Use of boundary objects 4.4.3 Participation across the boundary 4.4.4 Mediation and a selectively permeable boundary 4.4.5 Translation 4.4.6 Coordination and complementary expertise 4.4.7 Additional success conditions identified 4.5 Discussion 101 4.5.1 Success conditions for institutionalising efforts to enhance salience, credibility and legitimacy 101 4.5.2 Creating an environment for 'enlightened' boundary work 102 CHAPTER 4: A changing climate for knowledge generation in agriculture: Lessons to institutionalise science-policy engagement 8 4.5.3 Opportunities for institutional analysis 4.6 Conclusion 5.1 Introduction 5.2 A theory of change to catalyse a transformation in food systems under climate change 5.3 Methods 5.4 Results 5.4.1 Biggest issues facing the food knowledge and innovation system 5.4.2 Priorities across themes 5.4.3 Empowering farmer and consumer organisations, women and youth 5.4.4 Digitally enabled climate-informed services 5.4.5 Climate-resilient and low-emission practices and technologies 5.4.6 Innovative finance to leverage public and private sector investments 5.4.7 Reshaping supply chains, food re...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.