No abstract

No abstract

Recent developments in design and manufacturing have greatly expanded the design space for functional part production by enabling control of structural details at small scales to inform behavior at the whole-structure level. This can be achieved with cellular materials, such as honeycombs, foams and lattices. Designing structures with cellular materials involves answering an important question: What is the optimum unit cell for the application of interest? There is currently no classification framework that describes the spectrum of cellular materials, and no methodology to guide the designer in selecting among the infinite list of possibilities. In this paper, we first review traditional engineering methods currently in use for selecting cellular materials in design. We then develop a classification scheme for the different types of cellular materials, dividing them into three levels of design decisions: tessellation, element type and connectivity. We demonstrate how a biomimetic approach helps a designer make decisions at all three levels. The scope of this paper is limited to the structural domain, but the methodology developed here can be extended to the design of components in thermal, fluid, optical and other areas. A deeper purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how traditional methods in design can be combined with a biomimetic approach.

The design of cellular materials has recently undergone a paradigm shift, enabled by developments in Additive Manufacturing and design software. No longer do cellular materials have to be limited to traditional shapes such as honeycomb panels or stochastic foams. With this increase in design freedom comes a significant increase in optionality, which can be overwhelming to the designer. This paper aims to provide a framework for thinking about the four key questions in cellular material design: how to select a unit cell, how to vary cell size spatially, what the optimal parameters are, and finally, how best to integrate a cellular material within the structure at large. These questions are posed with the intent of stimulating further research that can address them individually, as well as integrate them in a systematic methodology for cellular material design. Different state-of-the-art solution approaches are also presented in order to provoke further investigation by the reader.

Lattice structures have tailorable mechanical properties which allows them to exhibit superior mechanical properties (per unit weight) beyond what is achievable through natural materials. In this paper, quasi-static and dynamic behavior of additively manufactured stainless steel lattice cylinders is studied. Cylindrical samples with internal lattice structure are fabricated by a laser powder bed fusion system. Equivalent hollow cylindrical samples with the same length, outer diameter, and mass (larger wall thickness) are also fabricated. Split Hopkinson bar is used to study the behavior of the specimens under high strain rate loading. It is observed that lattice cylinders reduce the transmitted wave amplitude up to about 21% compared to their equivalent hollow cylinders. However, the lower transmitted wave energy in lattice cylinders comes at the expense of a greater reduction in their stiffness, when compared to their equivalent hollow cylinder. In addition, it is observed that increasing the loading rate by five orders of magnitude leads to up to about 36% increase in the peak force that the lattice cylinder can carry, which is attributed to strain rate hardening effect in the bulk stainless steel material. Finite element simulations of the specimens under dynamic loads are performed to study the effect of strain rate hardening, thermal softening, and the failure mode on dynamic behavior of the specimens. Numerical results are compared with experimental data and good qualitative agreement is observed.