Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly being integrated into the domain of precision agriculture, revolutionizing the agricultural landscape. Specifically, UAVs are being used in conjunction with machine learning techniques to solve a variety of complex agricultural problems. This paper provides a careful survey of more than 70 studies that have applied machine learning techniques utilizing UAV imagery to solve agricultural problems. The survey examines the models employed, their applications, and their performance, spanning a wide range of agricultural tasks, including crop classification, crop and weed detection, cropland mapping, and field segmentation. Comparisons are made among supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised machine learning approaches, including traditional machine learning classifiers, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), single-stage detectors, two-stage detectors, and transformers. Lastly, future advancements and prospects for UAV utilization in precision agriculture are highlighted and discussed. The general findings of the paper demonstrate that, for simple classification problems, traditional machine learning techniques, CNNs, and transformers can be used, with CNNs being the optimal choice. For segmentation tasks, UNETs are by far the preferred approach. For detection tasks, two-stage detectors delivered the best performance. On the other hand, for dataset augmentation and enhancement, generative adversarial networks (GANs) were the most popular choice.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) are increasingly being used in a variety of domains and precision agriculture is no exception. Precision agriculture is the future of agriculture and will play a key role in long-term sustainability of agricultural practices. This paper presents a survey of how image data collected using UAVs has been used in conjunction with ma-chine learning techniques to support precision agriculture. Numerous agricultural applications including classification of crop types and trees, crops detection, weed detection, cropland cover, and segmentation of farming fields are discussed. A variety of supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques for image-based preci-sion agriculture are compared. The survey showed that for traditional machine learning approaches, Random Forests performed better than Support Vector Machines (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm (KNN) for crop/weed classification. And, while Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have been used extensively, the U-Net-based models out-performed conventional CNN models for classification and segmentation tasks. Among the Single Stage Detectors (SSD), YOLO series performed relatively well. Two-Stage Detectors like R-CNN, FPN, and Mask R-CNN generally tended to outperform SSDs. Vision Trans-formers (ViT) showed promising results amongst transformer-based models which did not generally perform better than CNNs. Finally, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been used to address the problem of smaller datasets and unbalanced data

No abstract

No abstract

Many applications in agriculture as well as other related fields including natural resources, environment, health, and sustainability, depend on recent and reliable cropland maps. Cropland extent and intensity plays a critical input variable for the study of crop production and food security around the world. However, generating such variables manually is difficult, expensive, and time consuming. In this work, we discuss a cost effective, fast, and simple machine-learning-based approach to provide reliable cropland mapping model using satellite imagery. The study includes four test regions, namely Iran, Mozambique, Sri-Lanka, and Sudan, where Sentinel-2 satellite imagery were obtained with assigned NDVI scores. The solution presented in this paper discusses a complete pipeline including data collection, time series reconstruction, and cropland extent and crop intensity mapping using machine learning models. The approach proposed managed to achieve high accuracy results ranging between 0.92 and 0.98 across the four test regions at hand.