Existing literature suggests that use of telemedicine during postoperative appointments can increase access to care and is valued by patients and providers alike. While research examining the clinical equivalency of telemedicine visits for postoperative care has been growing, few studies have reported on telemedicine follow-up after neurosurgery. This study examined if a videoconferencing visit could substitute for an in-person clinic visit for elective neurosurgical cases in the USA. This was a single-center prospective study of patients who underwent elective neurosurgical procedures (aneurysm clipping, resection of cavernous angiomas, resection of arterial venous malformation, microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm, and certain benign brain tumors) and were offered telemedicine follow-up care by an allied health professional during the first 90 days after neurosurgery. Prospective data was compared to a historical group of patients who underwent the same procedures and received in-person postoperative follow-up. Patients in the prospective group were contacted by telephone 2-6 weeks after surgery by a nurse practitioner and assessed using a standard template that included incidence of reported postoperative seizures, fever, and performance of activities of daily living. Primary outcome measures included percentage of patients accepting telemedicine, clinical and functional status, complications, patient satisfaction, patient travel time and distance, and rates of emergency room care or hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Ninety-nine patients were included in the study, with 57 in the prospective group and 42 in the historical group. Of the 57 prospective patients, 47 accepted telemedicine in lieu of an in-person clinic visit. Emergency room visits and readmission rates at 30 and 90 days postoperatively did not differ significantly between the study groups, nor was there any significant difference in clinical variables that were recorded in the electronic medical record more than 80% of the time. This study demonstrates the safety and value of telemedicine as an alternative method of postoperative clinical care for patients undergoing elective neurosurgery. Telemedicine avoids unnecessary travel time and was welcomed by the majority of patients without compromising clinical or functional outcomes.

No abstract

SummaryObjectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence for the use of low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov for all relevant articles. Relevant patient and stimulation predictors as well as seizure outcomes were assessed. For studies with and without individual participant data (IPD), the primary outcomes were the rate of “favorable response” (reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%) and pooled event rate of mean reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Outcomes were assessed with comparative statistics and random‐effects meta‐analysis models.ResultsOf 3,477 identified articles, 12 met eligibility and were included in this review. We were able to obtain IPD for 5 articles constituting 34 participants. Univariate analysis on IPD identified greater favorable response event rates between participants with temporal seizure focus versus extratemporal (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.045) and between participants who were stimulated with a figure‐8 coil versus other types (47% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). We also performed study‐level meta‐analysis on the remaining 7 studies without IPD, which included 212 participants. The pooled mean event rate of 50% seizure reduction using low‐frequency rTMS was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12–57%). Sensitivity analysis revealed that studies with a mean age ≤21 years and studies using targeted stimulation had the highest seizure reduction rates compared to studies with a mean age >21 years (69% vs. 18%) and not using a targeted stimulation (47% vs. 14–20%). Moreover, we identified high interstudy heterogeneity, moderate study bias, and high publication bias.SignificanceReal‐world evidence suggests that low‐frequency rTMS using a figure‐8 coil may be an effective therapy for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients. This meta‐analysis can inform the design and expedite recruitment of a subsequent randomized clinical trial.

No abstract