No abstract

La práctica del multiculturalismo en Colombia se ejerce en el contexto de complejas disputas y reclamos provenientes de diferentes actores sociales, beneficiarios o no de derechos diferenciales. En este artículo se estudian dos paradojas de los arreglos políticos del multiculturalismo en Colombia, relacionadas con la forma como se espacializa la diferencia indígena; y con ellas, se examinan sus implicaciones políticas. La primera paradoja es la forma como se juzga quién es o no un sujeto indígena legal, utilizando como una de las características predominantes el que un indígena viva en “su” resguardo rural. La segunda paradoja es el aislamiento político que se ha configurado entre indígenas y campesinos. De esta forma, se pretende demostrar la relevancia de estudiar no solo las políticas culturales, sino también la cultura política que posibilita y construye el multiculturalismo.

Multiculturalism, constructed as a liberal utopia intended to recognize marginal populations, commonly draws upon deceptive mechanisms that reify the old trope of anthropological “savage slots” (a term borrowed from Trouillot 2003 ). Such slots configure the relationship between politics and places: the fixation of ethnicity in a territory and the creation of strong frontiers—both physical and symbolic—between grantees and nongrantees of differential citizenships. In the case analyzed in this article, those frontiers reify the distinction between peasants and indigenous peoples; two group categories widely mobilized in the context of indigenous land expansion in the northern region of Colombia (South America). This article explores how an environmental “utopic space” used by state institutions and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), has turned into a fetish that hides a segment of Colombia's most dramatic reality: the violent context wherein paramilitary threats force small peasant landholders to sell and leave their land.

The focus of this article is a paradox inherent in the political effects of spatial claims undertaken by multicultural policies in many nation states: though territory is considered as one of the primary means of achieving autonomy and self-determination, it is at the same time a mechanism that encloses difference. Through a combination of archival and ethnographic research I study the political effects of binding indigenous people's minority rights with indigenous reservations in Colombia. I focus on analyzing the legal ways in which an "ethnic indigenous type" has been attached to an "ethnic indigenous rural topos" in the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court. I also examine how ethnic groups in the capital city of Bogotá have questioned the multicultural ideals of indigeneity and the romantic desires of what an indigenous place should look like. Ultimately, my intention is to draw attention both analytically and politically, to the necessity of more thorough analyses of the consequences of strict forms of spatializing ethnicity.

No abstract