This study examined whether student learning outcome measures are influenced by the addition of three-dimensional and digital teaching tools to a traditional dissection and lecture learning format curricula. The study was performed in a semester long graduate level course that incorporated both gross anatomy and neuroanatomy curricula. Methods compared student examination performance on material taught using lecture and cadaveric dissection teaching tools alone or lecture and cadaveric dissection augmented with computerized three-dimensional teaching tools. Additional analyses were performed to examine potential correlations between question difficulty and format, previous student performance (i.e., undergraduate grade point average), and a student perception survey. The results indicated that students performed better on material in which three-dimensional (3D) technologies are utilized in conjunction with lecture and dissection methodologies. The improvement in performance was observed across the student population primarily on laboratory examinations. Although, student performance was increased, students did not perceive that the use of the additional 3D technology significantly influenced their learning. The results indicate that the addition of 3D learning tools can influence long-term retention of gross anatomy material and should be considered as a beneficial supplement for anatomy courses. Anat Sci Educ 9: 529-536. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.
Peterson DC, Voytenko S, Gans D, Galazyuk A, Wenstrup J. Intracellular recordings from combination-sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 100: 629-645, 2008. First published May 21, 2008 doi:10.1152/jn.90390.2008. In vertebrate auditory systems, specialized combination-sensitive neurons analyze complex vocal signals by integrating information across multiple frequency bands. We studied combinationsensitive interactions in neurons of the inferior colliculus (IC) of awake mustached bats, using intracellular somatic recording with sharp electrodes. Facilitated combinatorial neurons are coincidence detectors, showing maximum facilitation when excitation from low-and high-frequency stimuli coincide. Previous work showed that facilitatory interactions originate in the IC, require both low and high frequency-tuned glycinergic inputs, and are independent of glutamatergic inputs. These results suggest that glycinergic inputs evoke facilitation through either postinhibitory rebound or direct depolarizing mechanisms. However, in 35 of 36 facilitated neurons, we observed no evidence of low frequency-evoked transient hyperpolarization or depolarization that was closely related to response facilitation. Furthermore, we observed no evidence of shunting inhibition that might conceal inhibitory inputs. Since these facilitatory interactions originate in IC neurons, the results suggest that inputs underlying facilitation are electrically segregated from the soma. We also recorded inhibitory combinatorial interactions, in which low frequency sounds suppress responses to higher frequency signals. In 43% of 118 neurons, we observed low frequency-evoked hyperpolarizations associated with combinatorial inhibition. For these neurons, we conclude that low frequency-tuned inhibitory inputs terminate on neurons primarily excited by high-frequency signals; these inhibitory inputs may create or enhance inhibitory combinatorial interactions. In the remainder of inhibited combinatorial neurons (57%), we observed no evidence of low frequency-evoked hyperpolarizations, consistent with observations that inhibitory combinatorial responses may originate in lateral lemniscal nuclei.
For analyses of complex sounds, many neurons integrate information across different spectral elements via suppressive effects that are distant from the neurons' excitatory tuning. In the mustached bat, suppression evoked by sounds within the first sonar harmonic (23-30 kHz) or in the subsonar band (<23 kHz) alters responsiveness to the higher best frequencies of many neurons. This study examined features and mechanisms associated with low-frequency (LF) suppression among neurons of the lateral lemniscal nuclei (NLL). We obtained extracellular recordings from neurons in the intermediate and ventral nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, observing different forms of LF suppression related to the two above-cited frequency bands. To understand the mechanisms underlying this suppression in NLL neurons, we examined the roles of glycinergic and GABAergic input through local microiontophoretic application of strychnine, an antagonist to glycine receptors (GlyRs), or bicuculline, an antagonist to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)Rs). With blockade of GABA(A)Rs, neurons showed an increase in firing rate to best frequency (BF) and/or LF tones but retained LF suppression of BF sounds. For neurons that displayed LF suppression tuned to 23-30 kHz, the suppression was eliminated or nearly eliminated by GlyR blockade. In contrast, GABA(A)R blockade did not eliminate nor had any consistent effect on suppression tuned to these frequencies. We conclude that LF suppression tuned in the 23- to 30-kHz range results from neuronal inhibition within the NLL via glycinergic inputs. For neurons displaying suppression tuned <23 kHz, neither GlyR nor GABAR blockade altered LF suppression. We conclude that such suppression originates at a lower auditory level, perhaps a result of cochlear mechanisms. These findings demonstrate that neuronal interactions within NLL create a particular form of LF suppression that contributes to the analysis of complex acoustic signals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.