This study investigates the evidence of Australian
Aboriginal witnesses in a New South Wales country courthouse,
focusing on how and why witnesses are silenced in examination-in-chief,
both by their own lawyer and by the judge. The analysis
questions the assumption in previous sociolinguistic research
that the syntactic form of questions is inherently related
to the way in which power is exercised in court. Further,
the article highlights how witness silencing in these cases
appears to occur particularly in situations where legal
professionals are seriously ignorant about fundamental
aspects of the everyday cultural values and practices of
Aboriginal people. Sociolinguistic microanalysis gives
a glimpse of one aspect of the process by which the powerlessness
and domination of Aboriginal people is perpetuated through
the legal system.
When asylum seekers flee persecution or war in their home countries, they often arrive in a new country seeking asylum, without documentation that can prove their nationality. They are thus open to the accusation that they are not actually fleeing persecution and/or war, but they are from another country and they are merely seeking 'a better life'. Indeed, among those who seek asylum there may well be some such people. Anyone arriving in such a way without a genuine fear of persecution in their home country cannot qualify for refugee status. In order to test nationality claims of asylum seekers, a number of governments are using 'language analysis', based on the assumption that the way that a person speaks contains clues about their origins. While linguists would not dispute this assumption, they are disputing a number of other assumptions, as well as practices, involved in this form of linguistic identification. This paper presents recent developments in this area of applied linguistics, including the release of Guidelines by a group of linguists concerning the use of language analysis in such asylum seeker cases. It concludes with discussion of the role of applied linguistics in questions of national origin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.