Introduction The Ebola virus disease epidemic was devastating to the West African region, particularly for pregnant women. Prior to the epidemic, maternal mortality in this region was among the highest in the world. Throughout the region, screening of patients with Ebola was difficult, as the symptoms of malaria or typhoid mimicked Ebola, but even more difficult for pregnant women, because of the large overlap between Ebola symptoms and pregnancy‐related complications. In November 2014, the world's first maternity‐specific isolation and screening system, to our knowledge, was created at the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital in Freetown to meet the emergent needs of the population of pregnant women during the epidemic. Process Starting in December 2014 through June 2016, in collaboration with hospital leadership and the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Partners In Health supported Princess Christian Maternity Hospital in creating a safer health care environment with the shared goal of improving safety and health outcomes and of addressing the unique needs of pregnant women, by focusing on improving 4 key areas: 1) screening, 2) isolation, 3) laboratory diagnostics, and 4) clinical service delivery in isolation, including human resource management and training. Outcomes The screening guidelines were adapted to include maternal health care considerations, a new screening area was constructed, the laboratory result turnaround time was reduced, and the isolation unit was improved to enhance safety and care delivery. Human resources were supported with additional staff hired and trainings on infection prevention and control, overall resulting in better preparing Princess Christian Maternity Hospital to provide care for pregnant women during outbreaks. Discussion The authors’ experience at Princess Christian Maternity Hospital provides a model of screening, isolation, and care specifically for maternity patients, and directly addresses infection risk and mortality. The recommendations we provide can be used in future outbreaks.
The clinical management of Ebola created a significant challenge during the outbreak in West Africa, due to the paucity of previous research conducted into the optimum treatment regimen. That left many centres, to some extent, having to ‘work out’ best practice as they went along, and attempting to conduct real time prospective research. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) [1] were the only organization to have provided relatively in depth practical guidance prior to the outbreak and this manual was the basis of further planning between the WHO, national Ministry of Health and Sanitation in Sierra Leone, and other relevant stakeholders. Additionally, guidance changed over the epidemic as experience grew. This chapter will describe four key areas in the management of Ebola in West Africa. Firstly, it outlines the most recent WHO guidance; secondly, it looks back at how Ebola was managed in differing low and high resource settings; thirdly it outlines possible and optimal options for managing complications, paying particular attention to some of the controversies faced; fourthly it describes recent and ongoing studies into potential novel therapies that may shape future practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.