Background: Patient work resumption after sickness absence varies even among patients with similar pathologies and characteristics. Explanations remain uncertain. One newly investigated field is ''information asymmetry'', a situation in which critical information is not appropriately exchanged between stakeholders in disability management. It is hypothesised that information asymmetry between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians prolongs sickness absence. Objectives: To assess the influence of enhanced information exchange between these physicians on patient outcome. Methods: Non-randomised controlled intervention study. The setting was the work inability assessment consultation of social insurance physicians in Belgium. Inclusion criteria were: employee, age 18-50, and subacute (more than one month) sickness absence. The intervention was a structured information exchange (through the use of a communication form) between the patient's social insurance physician and occupational physician. The intervention started when the patient's sickness absence reached the subacute stage, and ended when the sickness absence benefit was ceased or the duration exceeded one year. The primary outcome measure was the sickness absence benefit status of the patient assessed one year after benefit onset. Results: Of the 1883 patients asked to enrol in the study, 1564 (84%) participated; 505 (32%) of 1564 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 1059 (68%) to the control group; 1553 (99%) of 1564 patients completed the study. In the intervention group, 86% received no sickness absence benefit at the end of the study, versus 84% in the control group (95% CI 0.91-1.15). No significant differences in other outcome parameters were obtained. Conclusions: Information exchange between physicians may not be enough to influence work resumption among patients on sickness absence. Further research on stakeholders' information asymmetry and its effect on the outcome of patients are necessary. The complexity of information asymmetry in disability management cannot be underestimated.

This cross-sectional study was undertaken after the discovery of cobalt-related fibrosing alveolitis and bronchial asthma in diamond polishers occupationally exposed to cobalt. A total of 194 workers from 10 diamond polishing workshops and 59 workers from three other workshops from the diamond industry (control subjects) were studied; a questionnaire was administered and spirometry was performed. Cobalt exposure was assessed by environmental air sampling using both area and personal sampling and by measuring urinary cobalt concentration. When considered on a workshop basis, these environmental and biologic indices of exposure correlated well with each other. These measurements led to the definition of three cobalt exposure categories: a no exposure group, a low exposure group, and a high exposure group. The high exposure was, however, still below the present threshold limit value for cobalt (50 micrograms/m3). Spirometry showed that indices of ventilatory function (FVC and FEV1) were significantly (p less than 0.05) lower in the group with the highest exposure to cobalt. These differences were not due to differences in smoking habits. The results were confirmed when the data were analyzed by covariance analysis of lung function indices against smoking status, taking mean cobalt exposure in each workshop as a covariate, and when the data were analyzed by multiple regression analysis. This analysis showed that cobalt exposure correlated with decreased pulmonary function. Our results suggest that, during diamond polishing, exposure to cobalt at levels below the current threshold limit value is associated, on a group basis, with measurable effects on lung function parameters. The relationship between these cross-sectional epidemiologic findings and the occurrence of overt lung disease in diamond polishers remains to be established.

A rehabilitation-oriented approach by the medical advisers of social security can increase the probability of a return to work for patients after lumbar disc herniation surgery.