This study assessed the lipid composition of oocytes from different follicle sizes and compared the expression of lipid-related genes and follicular fluid (FF) molecules between groups. We also investigated the functional consequences of differences on embryo development and blastocyst lipid deposits. Oocytes and FF were recovered from different follicle sizes. Oocytes from small (≤5mm) and large (≥6mm) bovine follicles were used to produce Day 7 expanded blastocysts (Day7Ex) and blastocysts that only became expanded at Day 8 (Day8Ex) after insemination. Oocytes from >8mm follicles had the highest lipid content. Few oocyte phospholipid variations were identified between groups. Very long chain fatty acid elongase 6 (ELOVL6) mRNA abundance was reduced in larger follicle-derived oocytes compared with the ≤2mm group. Increased levels of glucose, reactive oxygen species, glutathione and superoxide dismutase activity were also identified in FF from larger follicles. Large follicle-derived embryo development and lipid content of Day7Ex were greater than those derived from small follicles. Day8Ex had greater lipid deposition than Day7Ex. Oocytes and blastocysts exhibited follicle size-specific lipids. Large-follicle oocytes had increased lipid content and became Day7Ex with greater lipid deposition whereas delayed blastocoel expansion associated with a prolonged period of culture determined the lipid accumulation of Day8Ex. The FF microenvironment of large follicles seems to favour embryo development.
In vitro production (IVP) of bovine embryos has been greatly improved over the last couple of years. However, only one-third of the total number of embryos transferred worldwide are of in vitro origin. The IVP embryos still show remarkable differences compared with their in vivo-derived counterparts (i.e. bovine embryos produced in vitro are more sensitive to cryopreservation). So far, vitrification seems to be the most promising method to cryopreserve in vitro-produced bovine embryos. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 2 different cryopreservation methods on the quality of in vitro-produced bovine embryos at the molecular level using a sensitive RT-qPCR assay. Bovine blastocysts were produced using abattoir ovaries and a standard protocol for IVP (Wrenzycki et al. 2001). They were randomly vitrified employing PBS plus ethylene glycol and DMSO or cryopreserved using a programmable freezer and 1.5 M ethylene glycol. After thawing, embryos from both groups were cultured for 48 h. After 24 h of culture re-expansion rates were documented, and after 48 h hatching rates were documented. After hatching, blastocysts were stored at -80°C for subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. The following gene transcripts known to play important roles during preimplantation development were analyzed: HSP70, GLUT-1, GLUT-3, E-CAD, ZO-1, DNMT3a, IFNτ, DCII. Re-expansion rates were 74.7% (68/91) and 75.0% (87/116) for vitrified and conventionally cryopreserved blastocysts, and 57.1% (52/91) and 55.2% (64/116) of re-expanded embryos hatched. The relative abundances of HSP70, GLUT-1, and ZO-1 transcripts were significantly affected in both groups of cryopreservation compared with the control group (hatched blastocysts without cryopreservation). Conventional cryopreservation had a significant effect on the amount of GLUT-3, DNMT3a, and IFNτ mRNA, whereas vitrification significantly affected DCII transcripts. E-CAD mRNA expression was similar in all groups of embryos. These results suggest that not only the cryopreservation process itself but also the method used to freeze the embryos had a significant influence on the mRNA expression of developmentally important genes in hatched bovine blastocysts. The support of the H.W. Schaumann Stiftung (Germany) and Gynemed Medizinprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (Germany) is gratefully acknowledged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.