How do event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting auditory processing develop across adolescence? Such development was described for five ERP components in four groups of 11 healthy participants with mean ages of 10, 14, 17, and 21 years. Data from 19 sites during diffuse (passive) and focused (discrimination) attention in a three-tone oddball were analyzed to see how ERP loci varied with age for tone type, attention condition, and for four types of difference waves reflecting nontarget and target comparisons. Age interacted with site for most components. P1 loci sensitive to rare tones moved posteriorly and N1 loci lost their right bias in early puberty. The P2 loci did not move anterior to Cz until adulthood. N2 amplitude, sensitive to attention condition, developed a frontal focus by 17 years. Right-biased P3 loci moved to the midline with focused attention similarly in all age groups. Difference waves developed in three stages: In 10-year-old participants, early deflections (< 150 ms) were diffusely distributed; in midadolescent participants, the main frontal negative component (150-300 ms) became well formed and lost an earlier right bias; and for participants 17 years old and older, the late positive complex developed a right bias in target-derived waves. Latency decreases for early frontal components were marked in participants 10-14 years old and for later posterior components in participants 14-17 years old. Major developments appeared at the onset of adolescence in early stimulus selection processes and during adolescence in the differential use of this information (N2- and P3-like latencies).

The study compares 5 auditory event-related potential (ERP) components (P1 to P3) after 3 tones differing in pitch and rarity, and contrasts the mismatch negativity (MMN) between them in 12 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; mean 10.2 years of age), 12 healthy controls pairwise matched for age (controls), and 10 with Chronic Tic or Tourette Syndrome (TS). Topographic recordings were derived from 19 scalp electrodes. Four major effects are reported. (a) Shorter latencies in ADHD patients were evident as early as 100 ms. (b) Both ADHD and TS groups showed very large P2 components where the maxima were shifted anteriorly. The differences in the later potentials were of a topographical nature. (c) Frontal MMN was non-significantly larger in the ADHD group but normalized data showed a left rather than a right frontal bias as in control subjects. Maxima for TS were usually posterior. (d) ADHD patients did not show the usual right-biased P3 asymmetry nor the frontal versus parietal P3 latency difference. From these results it is suggested that ADHD patients process perceptual information faster from an early stage (N1). Further, along with the TS group, ADHD patients showed an unusually marked inhibitory phase in processing (P2), interpreted as a reduction of the normal controls on further processing. Later indices of stimulus processing (N2-P3) showed a frontal impairment in TS and a right hemisphere impairment in ADHD patients. These are interpreted in terms of the difficulties in sustaining attention experienced by both ADHD and TS patients.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a measure of the influence of a stimulus (S1) on the response elicited by a second stimulus (S2) occurring shortly afterwards. Most S1/S2 measures of gating have used behavioural startle and the P50 event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes to detect PPI in a simple paired stimulus paradigm. We report on two behavioural (reaction time, RT, and the electromyographically recorded response of the musculus orbicularis oculi, EMG) and 5 ERP measures of PPI where S2 was the target in an auditory two-tone discrimination. Subjects were 21 healthy controls (CON), 11 obsessive-compulsive (OCD) and 9 schizophrenic patients (SCH). The prepulse 100 ms before S2 induced more omission errors and longer RTs compared to 500ms S1-S2 interval in all subjects. PPI was also evident in EMG, P50, N1, P3 but not P2 or N2 amplitudes of CON subjects. SCH patients showed attenuation of PPI on the same measures. OCD patients were characterized only by their slow RT and a marginal attenuation of PPI of the EMG response. A correlational analysis implied separate relationships of ERP indices of PPI to the cognitive and psychomotor consequences of the prepulse on behavioural and discrimination responses. However, SCH patients showed a general rather than a specific impairment of these indices.

Mismatch negativity (MMN), in the deviant-minus-standard event-related potential (ERP) difference-waveform, may represent a working memory trace of the tone difference. Most but not all studies find MMN reduced in schizophrenic patients. This report investigates if differences may be attributable to experimental condition (diffuse vs focused attention), component identification (N1-like vs N2-like), topographic distribution, and clinical condition (with/without paranoid-hallucinatory symptoms, PH/NP). Comparisons were made for 12 PH, 12 NP schizophrenic patients with 13 obsessive compulsive and 25 normal control subjects. Frontal MMN reduction in schizophrenics largely resulted from an absence of an increase in focused attention conditions as in comparison groups. But there was a marked temporal activity locus in NP patients. These features were not reflected in other components except for a visible but nonsignificant N1-like temporal locus in NP patients. Further, schizophrenic patients did not show an increase in late positivity with focused attention like the comparison groups. The results show that so-called automatic processing deficits (amount and locus of MMN) are best seen in situations requiring the activation of controlled attentional processes. It is suggested that impaired processing of irrelevant stimuli and reduced frontal MMN in NP patients may reflect reduced dopaminergic responsivity.

Event-related potentials (ERPS) in schizophrenics have been reported to show a reduced P3 on the left and less frontal mismatch negativity (MMN). But the specificity of such findings to component, its locus, the type of eliciting event and patient group remains uncertain. Hence, we examined ERP topography for P3, N2 and 3 precursor peaks according to stimulus (3-tone oddball), attention condition (diffuse/focused) and four types of difference-waves. We contrasted 24 healthy and 13 OCD subjects with schizophrenic patients with high versus low ratings of active delusions and hallucinations (12 paranoid-hallucinatory, PH; 12 nonparanoid, NP). P3 peaks were delayed and reduced in NP and PH groups. Midline peaks were usual in focused attention and a right bias in diffuse attention. P3 responses to irrelevant standards remained lateral in NP and small in OCD patients. All showed a small left and anterior bias in the P3-like peak in difference-waves. Mismatch negativity waveform (MMN) peaks shifted to the right in OCD, to both sides in PH and posteriorly in NP patients. Frontal processing negativity was biased to the left (early) in NP and to the right (late) in PH groups. Early peak topography reflected some later changes (e.g. PH and NP groups; P1-like peak, right bias absent; N1-like peak depressed and widely distributed; NP group, P2-like peak smaller on the left). In OCD patients, peak latencies were topographically undifferentiated (P1, P2) or delayed (N2). The OCD group showed an unusual regional allocation of processing effort. Before 200 ms frontocentral activity was more widespread in Ph and NP groups. Lateralization of negativity in target- and nontarget-derived difference-waves may reflect differential disruption of the frontal-temporal dialogue in registering important vs unimportant features. NP patients, in particular, treated irrelevant stimuli anomalously.