Background: In patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) the frequency of large genomic deletions in the SMAD4 and BMPR1A genes was unknown. Methods: Mutation and phenotype analysis was used in 80 unrelated patients of whom 65 met the clinical criteria for JPS (typical JPS) and 15 were suspected to have JPS. Results: By direct sequencing of the two genes, point mutations were identified in 30 patients (46% of typical JPS). Using MLPA, large genomic deletions were found in 14% of all patients with typical JPS (six deletions in SMAD4 and three deletions in BMPR1A). Mutation analysis of the PTEN gene in the remaining 41 mutation negative cases uncovered a point mutation in two patients (5%). SMAD4 mutation carriers had a significantly higher frequency of gastric polyposis (73%) than did patients with BMPR1A mutations (8%) (p,0.001); all seven cases of gastric cancer occurred in families with SMAD4 mutations. SMAD4 mutation carriers with gastric polyps were significantly older at gastroscopy than those without (p,0.001). In 22% of the 23 unrelated SMAD4 mutation carriers, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) was also diagnosed clinically. The documented histologic findings encompassed a wide distribution of different polyp types, comparable with that described in hereditary mixed polyposis syndromes (HMPS). Conclusions: Screening for large deletions raised the mutation detection rate to 60% in the 65 patients with typical JPS. A strong genotype-phenotype correlation for gastric polyposis, gastric cancer, and HHT was identified, which should have implications for counselling and surveillance. Histopathological results in hamartomatous polyposis syndromes must be critically interpreted.

In around 30% of families with colorectal adenomatous polyposis, no germline mutation in the previously-implicated genes APC, MUTYH, POLE, POLD1, or NTHL1 can be identified, although a hereditary etiology is likely. To uncover further genes with high-penetrance causative mutations, exome sequencing of leukocyte DNA from 102 unrelated individuals with unexplained adenomatous polyposis was performed. We identified two unrelated individuals with differing compound-heterozygous loss-of-function germline mutations in the mismatch repair gene MSH3. The impact of the MSH3 mutations (c.1148delA, c.2319-1g>a, c.2760delC, c.3001-2a>c) was indicated on RNA and protein level. Analysis of the diseased individuals’ tumor tissue demonstrated high microsatellite instability of di- and tetranucleotides (EMAST) and immunohistochemical staining illustrated a complete loss of nuclear MSH3 in normal and tumor tissue, confirming the loss-of-function effect and causal relevance of the mutations. The pedigrees, genotypes, and the frequency of MSH3 mutations in the general population are consistent with an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. Both index persons had an affected sibling carrying the same mutations. The tumor spectrum in these four persons comprised colorectal and duodenal adenomas, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and an early-onset astrocytoma. Additionally, we detected one unrelated individual with biallelic PMS2 germline mutations, representing Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome (CMMRD). Potentially causative variants in 14 more candidate genes identified in 26 other individuals require further workup. In the present study we describe biallelic germline mutations of MSH3 in individuals with a suspected hereditary tumor syndrome. Our data suggest that MSH3 mutations represent an additional recessive subtype of colorectal adenomatous polyposis.

Germline mutations in the STK11 gene have been identified in 10-70% of patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), an autosomal-dominant hamartomatous polyposis syndrome. A second locus was assumed in a large proportion of PJS patients. To date, STK11 alterations comprise mainly point mutations; only a small number of large deletions have been reported. We performed a mutation analysis for the STK11 gene in 71 patients. Of these, 56 met the clinical criteria for PJS and 12 were presumed to have PJS because of mucocutaneous pigmentation only or bowel problems due to isolated PJS polyps. No clinical information was available for the remaining three patients. By direct sequencing of the coding region of the STK11 gene, we identified point mutations in 37 of 71 patients (52%). We examined the remaining 34 patients by means of the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method, and detected deletions in 17 patients. In four patients the deletion extended over all 10 exons, and in eight patients only the promoter region and exon 1 were deleted. The remaining deletions encompassed exons 2-10 (in two patients), exons 2-3, exons 4-5, or exon 8. When only patients who met the clinical criteria for PJS are considered, the overall mutation detection rate increases to 94% (64% point mutations and 30% large deletions). No mutation was identified in any of the 12 presumed cases. In conclusion, we found that approximately one-third of the patients who met the clinical PJS criteria exhibited large genomic deletions that were readily detectable by MLPA. Screening for point mutations and large deletions by direct sequencing or MLPA, respectively, increased the mutation detection rate in the STK11 gene up to 94%. There may be still other mutations in the STK11 gene that are not detectable by the methods applied here. Therefore, it is questionable whether a second PJS locus exists at all.

Somatic mutational mosaicism presents a challenge for both molecular and clinical diagnostics and may contribute to deviations from predicted genotype-phenotype correlations. During APC mutation screening in 1,248 unrelated patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), we identified 75 cases with an assumed or confirmed de novo mutation. Prescreening methods (protein truncation test [PTT], DHPLC) indicated the presence of somatic mosaicism in eight cases (11%). Sequencing of the corresponding fragments revealed very weak mutation signals, pointing to the presence of either nonsense or frameshift mutations at low level. All mutations were confirmed and quantified by SNaPshot analysis: in leukocyte DNA from the eight patients, the percentage of mosaicism varied between 5.5% and 77%, while the proportion of the mutation in DNA extracted from adenomas of the respective patient was consistently higher. The eight mutations identified as mosaic are localized within codons 216-1464 of the APC gene. According to the known genotype-phenotype correlation, patients with mutations in this region exhibit typical or severe FAP. However, six of the eight patients presented with an attenuated or atypical polyposis phenotype. Our data demonstrate that in a fraction of FAP patients the causative APC mutation may not be detected due to weak signals or somatic mosaicism that is restricted to tissues other than blood. SNaPshot analysis was proven to be an easy, rapid, and reliable method of confirming low-level mutations and evaluating the degree of mosaicism. Some of the deviations from the expected phenotype in FAP can be explained by the presence of somatic mosaicism.

In a number of families with colorectal adenomatous polyposis or suspected Lynch syndrome/HNPCC, no germline alteration in the APC, MUTYH, or mismatch repair (MMR) genes are found. Missense mutations in the polymerase genes POLE and POLD1 have recently been identified as rare cause of multiple colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, a condition termed polymerase proofreading‐associated polyposis (PPAP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical relevance and phenotypic spectrum of polymerase germline mutations. Therefore, targeted sequencing of the polymerase genes POLD1, POLD2, POLD3, POLD4, POLE, POLE2, POLE3 and POLE4 was performed in 266 unrelated patients with polyposis or fulfilled Amsterdam criteria. The POLE mutation c.1270C>G;p.Leu424Val was detected in four unrelated patients. The mutation was present in 1.5% (4/266) of all patients, 4% (3/77) of all familial cases and 7% (2/30) of familial polyposis cases. The colorectal phenotype in 14 affected individuals ranged from typical adenomatous polyposis to a HNPCC phenotype, with high intrafamilial variability. Multiple colorectal carcinomas and duodenal adenomas were common, and one case of duodenal carcinoma was reported. Additionally, various extraintestinal lesions were evident. Nine further putative pathogenic variants were identified. The most promising was c.1306C>T;p.Pro436Ser in POLE. In conclusion, a PPAP was identified in a substantial number of polyposis and familial colorectal cancer patients. Screening for polymerase proofreading mutations should therefore be considered, particularly in unexplained familial cases. The present study broadens the phenotypic spectrum of PPAP to duodenal adenomas and carcinomas, and identified novel, potentially pathogenic variants in four polymerase genes.