Background and Aims:Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) during apnoea has shown to delay desaturation. The primary objective was to compare time to desaturate to <90% during apnoea with THRIVE versus traditional preoxygenation followed by apnoeic oxygenation.Methods:This prospective, randomised, single-blinded study was conducted in 10 adult patients presenting for direct laryngoscopy under general anaesthesia without endotracheal intubation. Group P patients were preoxygenated with 100% oxygen, and in Group H, high-flow humidified oxygen was delivered using nasal cannula for 3 min. After induction and neuromuscular blockade, time to desaturate to 90%, while receiving apnoeic oxygenation, was noted. Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney tests were used.Results:Group H had a significantly longer apnoea time as compared to Group P (796.00 ± 43.36 vs. 444.00 ± 52.56 s). All patients in Group H continued to have nearly 100% saturation even at 12 min of apnoea. However, in Group P, 80% of patients desaturated to <90% after 6 min of apnoea. Baseline blood gases, that following preoxygenation and at 3 min of apnoea time were comparable in both groups. At 6 min, Group H had a significantly higher PaO2 (295.20 ± 122.26 vs. 135.00 ± 116.78) and PaCO2 (69.46 ± 7.15 vs. 59.00 ± 4.64). Group H continued to have a PaO2 of >200 mmHg even at 12 min of apnoea with a significant rise in PaCO2 along with fall in pH after 6 min.Conclusion:During apnoeic periods time to desaturate to <90% was significantly prolonged with use of THRIVE.

No abstract

Background and Aims: Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly infectious disease and healthcare workers are at constant risk for contracting it. Nowadays, aerosol box is used in conjunction with WHO-recommended safety kits, to avoid health workers from getting SARS-CoV-2 infection during aerosol-generating procedures. In our study, we compared the ease of oral intubation with C-MAC video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy, when the aerosol box was used. The secondary objectives were to compare the incidence of airway loss, haemodynamic changes, number of attempts, and time required for intubation between these two techniques. Methods: This prospective randomised controlled study was conducted on 60 non-coronavirus disease (COVID) patients presenting for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups:C and D using a computer-generated random sequence of numbers by closed envelope technique. In group D, laryngoscopy was performed with Macintosh blade and in group C, with Storz® C-MAC video laryngoscope. Results: The ease of intubation was better (grade 1) in group C than D (68.6% vs. 31.4% respectively) with a P value of < 0.001. 10% of patients required more than one intubation attempt in group D compared to none in group C, but this difference was not statistically significant. The intubation time was comparable between the two groups. There were no incidences of loss of airway or failure to intubate in both groups. Conclusion: The use of C-MAC video-laryngoscopy resulted in easier orotracheal intubation as compared to intubation with direct laryngoscopy when the aerosol box was used.

Background: Over concerns of vasoconstriction leading to free flap failure, it has been a common practice to avoid vasopressors for the maintenance of blood pressure during reconstructive microvascular surgeries. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of use of noradrenaline in the perioperative period on outcome of free flaps in patients who underwent reconstructive surgeries as compared to those who did not receive noradrenaline. Settings and Design: Retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary care institute. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent free flap surgeries were included in the study, of which 102 patients who did not require noradrenaline perioperatively formed the control group (Group C), whereas those who required noradrenaline infusion constituted the study group (Group N). Data regarding flap outcome at discharge, intraoperative hemodynamics and temperature were documented. Statistical Test Used: Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test, Independent sample t -test, and paired t -test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 120 patients, 15% ( n = 18) patients required noradrenaline (Group N). In Group N, 27.78% ( n = 5) patients and in Group C, 22.55% ( n = 23) were re-explored. Four patients in Group C and none in Group N had a poor flap outcome (3.92% vs. 0%). There was no significant difference in surgical duration and the volume of crystalloids received in both groups. Preoperative hemoglobin levels were lower in Group N; intraoperatively, they were more hypothermic and needed more colloids, blood, and plasma. Conclusion: Perioperative use of noradrenaline did not adversely affect free flap survival in patients who underwent microvascular reconstructive surgeries. Although re-exploration rate was marginally increased with use of noradrenaline, the final flap outcome was unaffected.

No abstract