AVR can be undertaken with excellent results in octogenarians and the current risk is significantly lower than what is predicted with conventional risk-scoring systems. Patients with advanced age should not necessarily be excluded from being candidates for AVR.

Introduction Longer durations of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the effect of automated knot fasteners (Cor-Knot®) in minimally invasive mitral valve repair on operative times and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these devices shortened cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times and whether this impacted on postoperative outcomes. Materials and methods All patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve repair by a single surgeon between March 2011 and March 2016 were included (n = 108). Two cohorts were created based on the use (n = 52) or non-use (n = 56) of an automated knot fastener. Data concerning intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared. Results Preoperative demographics were well matched between groups with no significant difference in logistic Euroscore (manual vs automated: median 3.1, interquartile range, IQR, 2.1–5.5, vs 5.4, IQR 2.2–8.3; P = 0.07, respectively). Comparing manually tied knots to an automated fastener, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times were significantly shorter in the automated group (cardiopulmonary bypass: median 200 minutes, IQR 180–227, vs 165 minutes (IQR 145–189 minutes), P < 0.001; aortic cross clamp 134 minutes (IQR 121–150 minutes) vs 111 minutes (IQR 91–137 minutes), P < 0.001, respectively). There was no mortality and no strokes, nor were there any differences in postoperative outcomes including reoperation for bleeding, renal failure, intensive care or hospital stay. Conclusions The use of an automated knot fastener significantly reduces cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times in minimally invasive mitral valve repair but this does not translate into an improved clinical outcome.

Floating thrombi in the aorta are a rare finding in the absence of any coagulation abnormality. They often represent a surgical emergency. Our case refers to a 45-year-old woman who presented with acute ischemia of the upper extremity. This was a result of peripheral embolism originating in a floating thrombus in the ascending aorta. A free-floating lesion held by a pedicle from the lateral ascending aortic wall was demonstrated using computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans. There was no pre-existing clotting abnormality. Conservative treatment with oral anticoagulation was not successful in removing the lesion. Therefore, a surgical approach was selected through a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. Under temporary hypothermic circulatory arrest, the ascending aorta was opened. The lesion was removed along with a rim of aortic wall, circulation was re-established and the aorta was reconnected with use of a synthetic interposition graft. Postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on oral anticoagulation. Histopathology confirmed the lesion as thrombus. Only a few cases of intra-aortic thrombus without any coagulation abnormality basis are described in literature. Occasionally, they present as distal embolism. Treatment should be surgical excision on cardiopulmonary bypass, a procedure performed safely with excellent outcome.

AVR post-CABG with patent grafts can be performed in high-risk patients with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears to be superior to published catheter-based interventions. In the absence of randomized trial data, we believe that open AVR remains the treatment of choice for aortic valve disease following prior CABG.

Eliminating the source of bleeding as an emergency, resecting the oesophagus urgently to prevent sepsis and reconstructing the gastrointestinal continuity as an elective case after having the inflammatory processes settled seems to justify the endovascular aortic repair and subtotal oesophageal resection, followed by a gastro-oesophageal reconstruction, as an effective surgical approach.