Atypical forms of demyelinating diseases with tumor-like lesions and aggressive course represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for neurologists. Herein, we describe a 50-year-old woman presenting with subacute onset of left hemiparesis, memory difficulties and headache. Brain MRI revealed a tumefactive right frontal-parietal lesion with perilesional edema, mass effect and homogenous post-contrast enhancement, along with other small atypical lesions in the white-matter. Brain biopsy of cerebral lesion ruled out lymphoma or any other neoplastic process and patient placed on corticosteroids with complete clinical/radiological remission. Two years after disease initiation, there was disease exacerbation with reappearance of the tumor-like mass. The patient initially responded to high doses of corticosteroids but soon became resistant. Plasma-exchange sessions were not able to limit disease burden. Resistance to therapeutic efforts led to a second biopsy that showed perivascular demyelination, predominantly consisting of macrophages, with a small number of T and B lymphocytes, and the presence of reactive astrocytes, typical of Creutzfeldt-Peters cells. The patient received high doses of cyclophosphamide with substantial clinical/radiological response but relapsed after 7-intensive cycles. She received 4-weekly doses of rituximab with disease exacerbation and brainstem involvement. She eventually died with complicated pneumonia. We present a very rare case of recurrent tumefactive demyelinating lesions, with atypical tumor-like characteristics, with initial response to corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, but subsequent development of drug-resistance and unexpected exacerbation upon rituximab administration. Our clinical case raises therapeutic dilemmas and points to the need for immediate and appropriate immunosuppression in difficult to treat tumefactive CNS lesions with Marburg-like features.
Background and ObjectivesAutoantibodies against α3-subunit–containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α3-nAChRs), usually measured by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), are detected in patients with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG). However, low α3-nAChR antibody levels are frequently detected in other neurologic diseases with questionable significance. Our objective was to develop a method for the selective detection of the potentially pathogenic α3-nAChR antibodies, seemingly present only in patients with AAG.MethodsThe study involved sera from 55 patients from Greece, suspected for autonomic failure, and 13 patients from Italy diagnosed with autonomic failure, positive for α3-nAChR antibodies by RIPA. In addition, sera from 52 patients with Ca2+ channel or Hu antibodies and from 2,628 controls with various neuroimmune diseases were included. A sensitive live cell-based assay (CBA) with α3-nAChR–transfected cells was developed to detect antibodies against the cell-exposed α3-nAChR domain.ResultsTwenty-five patients were found α3-nAChR antibody positive by RIPA. Fifteen of 25 patients were also CBA positive. Of interest, all 15 CBA-positive patients had AAG, whereas all 10 CBA-negative patients had other neurologic diseases. RIPA antibody levels of the CBA-negative sera were low, although our CBA could detect dilutions of AAG sera corresponding to equally low RIPA antibody levels. No serum bound to control-transfected cells, and none of the 2,628 controls was α3-CBA positive.DiscussionThis study showed that in contrast to the established RIPA for α3-nAChR antibodies, which at low levels is of moderate disease specificity, our CBA seems AAG specific, while at least equally sensitive with the RIPA. This study provides Class II evidence that α3-nAChR CBA is a specific assay for AAG.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that an α3-nAChR cell-based assay is a more specific assay for AAG than the standard RIPA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.