Data-intensive applications fueled the evolution of log structured merge (LSM) based key-value engines that employ the out-of-place paradigm to support high ingestion rates with low read/write interference. These benefits, however, come at the cost of treating deletes as a second-class citizen. A delete inserts a tombstone that invalidates older instances of the deleted key. State-of-the-art LSM engines do not provide guarantees as to how fast a tombstone will propagate to persist the deletion. Further, LSM engines only support deletion on the sort key. To delete on another attribute (e.g., timestamp), the entire tree is read and re-written. We highlight that fast persistent deletion without affecting read performance is key to support: (i) streaming systems operating on a window of data, (ii) privacy with latency guarantees on the right-to-be-forgotten, and (iii) en masse cloud deployment of data systems that makes storage a precious resource.To address these challenges, in this paper, we build a new key-value storage engine, Lethe, that uses a very small amount of additional metadata, a set of new delete-aware compaction policies, and a new physical data layout that weaves the sort and the delete key order. We show that Lethe supports any user-defined threshold for the delete persistence latency offering higher read throughput (1.17 − 1.4×) and lower space amplification (2.1 − 9.8×), with a modest increase in write amplification (between 4% and 25%). In addition, Lethe supports efficient range deletes on a secondary delete key by dropping entire data pages without sacrificing read performance nor employing a costly full tree merge.

Log-structured merge (LSM) trees offer efficient ingestion by appending incoming data, and thus, are widely used as the storage layer of production NoSQL data stores. To enable competitive read performance, LSM-trees periodically re-organize data to form a tree with levels of exponentially increasing capacity, through iterative compactions. Compactions fundamentally influence the performance of an LSM-engine in terms of write amplification, write throughput, point and range lookup performance, space amplification, and delete performance. Hence, choosing the appropriate compaction strategy is crucial and, at the same time, hard as the LSM-compaction design space is vast, largely unexplored, and has not been formally defined in the literature. As a result, most LSM-based engines use a fixed compaction strategy, typically hand-picked by an engineer, which decides how and when to compact data. In this paper, we present the design space of LSM-compactions, and evaluate state-of-the-art compaction strategies with respect to key performance metrics. Toward this goal, our first contribution is to introduce a set of four design primitives that can formally define any compaction strategy: (i) the compaction trigger, (ii) the data layout, (iii) the compaction granularity, and (iv) the data movement policy. Together, these primitives can synthesize both existing and completely new compaction strategies. Our second contribution is to experimentally analyze 10 compaction strategies. We present 12 observations and 7 high-level takeaway messages, which show how LSM systems can navigate the compaction design space.

Data-intensive applications have fueled the evolution of log-structured merge (LSM) based key-value engines that employ the out-of-place paradigm to support high ingestion rates with low read/write interference. These benefits, however, come at the cost of treating deletes as second-class citizens . A delete operation inserts a tombstone that invalidates older instances of the deleted key. State-of-the-art LSM-engines do not provide guarantees as to how fast a tombstone will propagate to persist the deletion . Further, LSM-engines only support deletion on the sort key. To delete on another attribute (e.g., timestamp), the entire tree is read and re-written, leading to undesired latency spikes and increasing the overall operational cost of a database. Efficient and persistent deletion is key to support: (i) streaming systems operating on a window of data, (ii) privacy with latency guarantees on data deletion, and (iii) en masse cloud deployment of data systems. Further, we document that LSM-based key-value engines perform suboptimally in presence of deletes in a workload. Tombstone-driven logical deletes, by design, are unable to purge the deleted entries in a timely manner, and retaining the invalidated entries perpetually affects the overall performance of LSM-engines in terms of space amplification, write amplification, and read performance. Moreover, the potentially unbounded latency for persistent deletes brings in critical privacy concerns in light of the data privacy protection regulations, such as the right to be forgotten in EU’s GDPR, the right to delete in California’s CCPA and CPRA, and deletion right in Virginia’s VCDPA. Toward this, we introduce the delete design space for LSM-trees and highlight the performance implications of the different classes of delete operations. To address these challenges, in this article, we build a new key-value storage engine, Lethe + , that uses a very small amount of additional metadata, a set of new delete-aware compaction policies, and a new physical data layout that weaves the sort and the delete key order. We show that Lethe + supports any user-defined threshold for the delete persistence latency offering higher read throughput (1.17 × −1.4 ×) and lower space amplification (2.1 × −9.8 ×), with a modest increase in write amplification (between \(4\% \) and \(25\% \) ) that can be further amortized to less than \(1\% \) . In addition, Lethe + supports efficient range deletes on a secondary delete key by dropping entire data pages without sacrificing read performance or employing a costly full tree merge.