BackgroundFungal Endocarditis (FE), a relatively rare disease, has a high rate of mortality and is associated with multiple morbidities. Aspergillus endocarditis (AE) is severe form of FE. Incidence of AE has increased and is expected to rise due to an increased frequency of invasive procedures, cardiac devices and prosthetic valves together with increased use of immune system suppressors. AE lacks most of the clinical criteria used to diagnose infective endocarditis (IE), where blood culture is almost always negative, and fever may be absent. Diagnosis is usually late and in many cases is made post-mortem. Late or mistaken diagnosis of AE contribute to delayed and incorrect management of patients. In the current study we aimed to describe the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics of AE, to identify predictors of early diagnosis of this serious infection.MethodsPatients with definite/possible IE, as diagnosed by the Kasr Al-Ainy IE Working Group from February 2005 through June 2016, were reviewed in this study. We compared the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging criteria of AE patients to non-fungal IE patients.ResultsThis study included 374 patients with IE in which FE accounted for 43 cases. Aspergillus was the most common fungus (31 patients; 8.3%) in the patient group. Lack of fever and acute limb ischemia at presentation were significantly associated with AE (p < 0.001, p = 0.014, respectively). Health care associated endocarditis (HAE) and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) were the only significant risk factors associated with AE (p < 0.001 for each). Mitral, non-valvular, and aortotomy site vegetations, as well as aortic abscess/pseudoaneurysm, were significantly associated with AE (p = 0.022, p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Through multivariate regression analysis, HAE, PVE, aortic abscess/pseudoaneurysm, and lack of fever were strongly linked to AE. The probability of an IE patient having AE with HAE, PVE, and aortic abscess/pseudoaneurysm, but no fever, was 0.92. In contrast, the probability of an IE patient having AE with fever, native valve IE, but no health-care associated IE and no abscess/pseudoaneurysm, was 0.003. Severe sepsis and mortality in the Aspergillus group were higher as compared to the non-fungal group (p = 0.098 and 0.097, respectively). Thirteen AE patients died during hospitalization. PVE, the use of single versus dual antifungal agents, severe heart failure, and severe sepsis were significant predictors of mortality (p = 0.008, 0.012, 0.003, and 0.01, respectively).ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to address diagnostic criteria for AE. Through multivariate regression analysis, absence of fever, HAE, PVE, and aortic abscess/pseudoaneurysm were strong predictors of AE. Use of these criteria my lead to earlier diagnoses of AE. Early treatment of AE patients with voriconazole in combination with other antifungal agents may be possible based on the previously mentioned criteria, which may facilitate better patient outcomes.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in microRNA-146a (miRNA-146a) can be associated with the development of immune-system dysfunctions.The aim of this work is to correlate SNPs of miRNA-146a and its target gene, IRAK1, with susceptibility, clinical manifestations, and diseases progression in patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Genotyping for miRNA-146a (rs2910164) and its target gene IRAK1 (rs3027898) was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 80 patients with SLE and 70 patients with MS, as well as 120 healthy control individuals. A statistically significant difference was found between the frequencies of the genotypes and alleles of miRNA-146a (rs2910164) and IRAK1 (rs3027898), compared with the control group. Also, whereas the mutant allele G of miRNA-146a may be a factor in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, the mutant allele C of IRAK1 may play a role in lupus arthritis. Both genes may contribute to the susceptibility of patients to SLE and MS.
Background The overlap between cancer and cardiovascular care continues to expand, with intersections emerging before, during, and following cancer therapies. To date, emphasis has been placed on how cancer therapeutics influence downstream cardiac health. However, whether active malignancy itself influences chamber volumes, function, or overall myocardial tissue health remains uncertain. We sought to perform a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance‐based evaluation of cardiac health in patients with chemotherapy‐naïve cancer with comparison with a healthy volunteer population. Methods and Results Three‐hundred and eighty‐one patients with active breast cancer or lymphoma before cardiotoxic chemotherapy exposure were recruited in addition to 102 healthy volunteers. Both cohorts underwent standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with quantification of chamber volumes, ejection fraction, and native myocardial T1. Left ventricular mechanics were incrementally assessed using three‐dimensional myocardial deformation analysis, providing global longitudinal, circumferential, radial, and principal peak‐systolic strain amplitude and systolic strain rate. The mean age of patients with cancer was 53.8±13.4 years; 79% being women. Despite similar left ventricular ejection fraction, patients with cancer showed smaller chambers, increased strain amplitude, and systolic strain rate in both conventional and principal directions, and elevated native T1 versus sex‐matched healthy volunteers. Adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, the presence of cancer remained associated with these cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters. Conclusions The presence of cancer is independently associated with alterations in cardiac chamber size, function, and objective markers of tissue health. Dedicated research is warranted to elucidate pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying these findings and to explore their relevance to the management of patients with cancer referred for cardiotoxic therapies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.