Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was determined in 180 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) before treatment. An abnormal level (greater than or equal to 6 ng/mL) was found in 34% of patients tested. Patients with extensive disease (39/83) had a significantly higher frequency of abnormal CEA (P = .001) than those with limited disease (22/97). There was a strong correlation between obtaining an objective response--particularly a complete response (P = .00003)--and the absence of an elevated CEA. Patients with an abnormal CEA also had a shorter survival time (P = .0007) and the difference remained statistically significant after logrank adjustment for extent of disease and ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status. There was also a negative correlation between survival time and the quantitative level of CEA. In this series, only the group of patients with normal initial CEA levels included all survivors beyond 2.5 years. We conclude that CEA is a useful prognostic factor in SCLC.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were determined in 742 postoperative patients with breast cancer. Within this group the percentage of elevated (greater than or equal to 4.0 ng/ml) assays increased with UICC clinical stage and was 14.8% (12/81), 23.7% (27/114), 73.1% (190/260) and 20.0% (49/245) for stages I, II, III, IV and X (unstagable due to insufficient data) patients. We have now followed the above 482 stages I, II, III and X patients in whom CEA was performed less than or equal to 3 months after initial surgery at a time when there was no evidence of residual disease, for an average interval of 255 days from date of diagnosis. At present 16.2% (17/105) of patients with elevated CEA values compared to only 4.8% (18/377) of patients with normal values have developed recurrent disease (p less than .0005). There is an association of elevation of CEA postoperatively with different clinical stages of breast cancer. Elevated CEA levels postoperatively are associated with an increased risk of development of recurrent disease in breast cancer patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.