Teachers' language assessment literacy (LAL) is critical to the success of education, the quality of students' learning, and students' willingness to study. Yet, studies on teachers' LAL preparation to face the Merdeka Belajar (Freedom of Learning) curriculum are still scarce. Most LAL studies used questionnaires to assess teachers' knowledge. In contrast to that, this study utilized teachers’ LAL knowledge test adapted from Al-bahlani (2019). This study investigates teachers' self-perceived LAL consisting of competence, frequency of practice, and assessment knowledge in The Association of English Teachers Banyumas district region (MGMP) with a total of 77 participants involved by investigating teachers' self-perceived LAL consisting of competence, frequency of practice, and assessment knowledge. The current study utilized two data sources, including a questionnaire and a language assessment knowledge test to employ a quantitative methodology using MANOVA and Pearson’s product-moment correlation. The results showed both strengths and weaknesses in the teachers’ LAL, as well as matches and mismatches between teachers' self-perceived and shown assessment knowledge. Overall, EFL teachers in Banyumas regency are at a fair level of LAL and pre-service training in assessment was the variable with the greatest impact on teachers' LAL. Future research may also require investigating the objectives, actions, and outcomes of assessment training provided by teachers’ training institutes and professional development programs. Keywords: LAL, Language assessment, Language Assessment Literacy, Merdeka Belajar curriculum, Freedom of Learning Curriculum.
This study aims to determine the results of the evaluation of the coaching program for petanque sports in Kediri district. This is an evaluation research. The evaluation model used in this research is CIPP. The subjects of this research were indicators, coaches and petanque athletes throughout the Kediri District. Purposive sampling is used as the sampling technique. The results showed that the evaluation of the petanque sports coaching program in the Kediri District was 2.74 in the good category. In addition, each evaluation aspect is broken down, namely: 1) the context of the evaluation score is 3.34 in the good category. The score for the background indicators for the coaching program, is 3.44 in the good category, the objective of the coaching program score is 3.50 in the good category, and the coaching program is in the 3.07 good category. 2) The input for the evaluation of the coaching program is 2.47 in poor category. Based on the indicators of human resources, it gets score 2.68 in good category, the trainer program in 2.64 in the good category, funding by 2.36 in the poor category, facilities and infrastructure in the 2.22 category in the poor category, and parental support in 2.45 in the poor category. 3) The process of evaluating the coaching program for petanque sports throughout the Kediri District is 2.71 in the good category. Based on the indicators of program implementation, its score is 2.61 in the good category and 2.80 in the good category for coordination. 4) Product evaluation of the coaching program gets 2.44 is in the poor category. Based on the achievement indicators of 2.44 in poor category.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.