An effective task-oriented chatbot should be able to exert a certain level of Social Intelligence (SI), the ability to emulate human social behaviors to reduce user frustration and dissatisfaction. However, few studies explored using humor, a common rhetorical device in human-human interactions, to improve chatbots' overall SI. To fill this gap, we proposed to apply self-mockery humor to a customer service chatbot in different interaction stages with users. We proposed a pipeline to create situated self-mockery for the chatbot and conducted a within-subject experiment (N=28) to compare it with a chatbot without self-mockery utterance. Results showed that the self-mockery chatbot was perceived as significantly funnier, more satisfactory, and delivering higher performance in two out of the five measured characteristics of SI with comparable performance in the rest. We further discussed how participants' individual factors might affect the perceived helpfulness of self-mockery on SI and concluded with design considerations. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Interactive systems and tools; Empirical studies in HCI.

Community-based Question Answering (CQA) platforms can provide rich experience and suggestions for people who seek to construct Activity Plans (AP), such as bodybuilding or sightseeing. However, answer posts in CQA platforms could be too unstructured and overwhelming to be easily applied to AP construction, as validated by our formative study for understanding relevant user challenges. We therefore proposed an answer-post processing pipeline, based on which we built PlanHelper, a tool assisting users in processing the CQA information and constructing AP interactively. We conducted a within-subject study (N=24) with a Quora-like interface as the baseline. Results suggested that when creating AP with PlanHelper, users were significantly more satisfied with the informational support and more engaged during the interaction. Moreover, we performed an in-depth analysis on the user behaviors with PlanHelper and summarized the design considerations for such supporting tools.

If it is the author's pre-published version, changes introduced as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing and formatting may not be reflected in this document. For a definitive version of this work, please refer to the published version.