The iridium hydride complexes have been extensively used in organic reactions, such as oxidation and hydrogenation reactions. In many of these reactions, the dissociation or formation of Ir-H bond plays an important role in determining the overall reaction rates and yields. In the present study, the accuracy of different theoretical methods for prediction of Ir-H bond strengths has been examined on the basis of the previously reported Ir-H BDEs of 17 different complexes. Comparing the performance of different DFT functionals (e.g. B3LYP, TPSS, M06), different basis sets (including the different effective core potentials (ECP) on Ir and I atoms, and the total electron basis sets on the other atoms), and different solvation models (SMD, CPCM, and IEFPCM) in solution phase single point calculations, we found that the gas-phase calculation with TPSS/(LanL2DZ: 6-31G(d)) method is relatively more accurate than the other gas-phase calculation methods, and can well simulate the Ir-H BDEs in low-polarity solvents (such as chlorobenzene and dichloroethane). Finally, efforts were put in analyzing the structure-activity relationships between the ligand structure (around Ir center) and the Ir-H BDEs. We wish the present study could benefit future studies on the Ir-H complexes involved organic reactions.
The recent development of Au‐catalyzed reactions has greatly enriched the methods of organic synthesis. The phosphine or phosphate‐coordinated Au complexes have shown high efficiency in catalyzing various CC and CH activations. In many of these reactions, the AuP bond strength was found to play an important role in determining the catalytic efficiency. In the present study, the accuracy of different theoretical methods for prediction of AuP strengths has been examined on basis of the experimental enthalpy changes between different ClAu(PR3) and ClAu(THT) (THT=tetrahydrothiophene). By comparing the different DFT functionals (e.g. B3LYP, TPSS, M06), different basis sets (including the different effective core potentials on Au and the total electron basis sets on all other atoms), and different solution phase single point calculations, we found that the TPSS/(CPE‐121G+f:6‐311+G(d,p)(SMD)//TPSS/(CPE‐121G:6‐31G(d) (M1) method gives the best correlations with the available experimental results. Meanwhile, the calculations with B3LYP//TPSS and M05//TPSS also give comparable calculation results. Finally, the specified method (M1) is used to calculate the AuP bond dissociation enthalpies and energies of different ClAu(PR3)/ClAu(P(OR)3) complexes. By accurately reproducing the available experimental results, we believe that the method (M1) is reliable for the theoretical analysis of Au‐P systems.
In real application scenarios, the inherent impreciseness of sensor readings, the intentional perturbation of privacy-preserving transformations, and error-prone mining algorithms cause much uncertainty of time series data. The uncertainty brings serious challenges for the similarity measurement of time series. In this paper, we first propose a model of uncertain time series inspired by Chebyshev inequality. It estimates possible sample value range and central tendency range in terms of sample estimation interval and central tendency estimation interval, respectively, at each time slot. In comparison with traditional models adopting repeated measurements and random variable, Chebyshev model reduces overall computational cost and requires no prior knowledge. We convert Chebyshev uncertain time series into certain time series matrix; therefore noise reduction and dimensionality reduction are available for uncertain time series. Secondly, we propose a new similarity matching method based on Chebyshev model. It depends on overlaps between two sample estimation intervals and overlaps between central tendency estimation intervals from different uncertain time series. At the end of this paper, we conduct an extensive experiment and analyze the results by comparing with prior works.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.