No abstract

Hydrocodone is primarily metabolized to hydromorphone and norhydrocodone. Although hydromorphone is a known active metabolite of hydrocodone, the in vivo activity of norhydrocodone is not well documented. In the current study, the pharmacodynamics of norhydrocodone were evaluated and compared with hydrocodone and hydromorphone. Binding studies established that norhydrocodone, similar to hydrocodone and hydromorphone, is a m-selective opioid ligand. In vivo analgesia studies (tail flick) demonstrated that, following subcutaneous, intrathecal, and intracerebroventricular administration, norhydrocodone produced analgesia. Following subcutaneous administration, norhydrocodone was ∼70-fold less potent, and hydromorphone was ∼5.4-fold more potent than hydrocodone in producing analgesia. Following intrathecal administration, norhydrocodone produced a shallow analgesia dose-response curve and maximal effect of 15-45%, whereas hydrocodone and hydromorphone produced dose-dependent analgesia. Intrathecal hydromorphone was ∼174-fold more potent than intrathecal hydrocodone. Following intracerebroventricular administration, norhydrocodone had similar potency to hydrocodone in producing analgesia, while hydromorphone was ∼96-fold more potent than hydrocodone. Analgesia induced by the three drugs following subcutaneous, intrathecal, and intracerebroventricular administration was antagonized by subcutaneous naltrexone, confirming that it is opioid receptor-mediated. Subcutaneous norhydrocodone-induced analgesia was completely blocked by intracerebroventricular naltrexone, indicating that norhydrocodone-induced analgesia is likely a supraspinal effect. Seizure activity was observed following intrathecal administration of all three drugs. Norhydrocodone and hydromorphone were ∼3.7 to 4.6-fold more potent than hydrocodone in inducing seizure activity. Naltrexone did not antagonize opioid-induced seizure activity, suggesting that seizures were not opioid receptormediated. Taken together, norhydrocodone is an active metabolite of hydrocodone and may contribute to therapeutic and toxic effects following hydrocodone administration.

On the basis of efficacy, opioid antagonists are classified as inverse opioid agonists (e.g. naltrexone) or neutral opioid antagonists (e.g. 6β-naltrexol). This study examined the interaction between naltrexone and 6β-naltrexol in the precipitated opioid withdrawal syndrome in morphine dependent mice. Furthermore, the possible contribution of constitutive opioid receptor activity to precipitated withdrawal was evaluated using increasing levels of morphine dependence. In the first experiment, low doses of 6β-naltrexol antagonized naltrexone precipitated withdrawal while high doses acted additively. All doses of naltrexone increased 6β-naltrexol’s potency to precipitate withdrawal. The next experiment examined changes in antagonist potency to precipitate withdrawal with increasing morphine dependence. Mice were exposed to morphine for 1-6 days and then withdrawal was precipitated. Naltrexone was more potent than 6β-naltrexol at all the time points. The ED50 of both drugs decreased at the same rate suggesting that increased dependence produced no change in constitutive opioid receptor activity. Taken together these results indicate that the functional efficacy of 6β-naltrexol is dose-dependent and that constitutive opioid receptor activity did not change as opioid dependence increased from 1-6 days.